Well.. i just looked through some archives and also on the
recent traffic in freebsd-questions.
It seems there are great many people that have same problem i do - apparently
our beloved system does not support PCI modems? Now if i am wrong here -
kick me and ignore the rest of the message.
If i
Hey!
Thanx a lot first of all!
Anytime i CAN write something myself - i do. I can go as low as networking code
or pseudodevice driver. But i am at loss when it comes to hardware (and within
my scope of work etc. i doubt i will ever learn this stuff). Thats why i
pleaded for help.
I volonteer
> > > I volonteer to be your first alpha-tester. I have this modem
> > > blaster thing. It is PCI and it has a UART. I was going to sell it
> > > and shell out lots of money for USRobotics 56K ISA real modem. BTW
> > > they call it "legacy" modem - i think the general direction is such
> > > that
Good day.
This is part one of what is (hopefully) will be my long and hard look in the
IP routing in FreeBSD as we know it. I must admit that i am out of shape on
many subjects and so much of this data may be wrong because of me doing
the Wrong Thing.
Anyway - these are the compressed results of da
Well..this is just something i picked off BugTraq..worths looking into?
If it's old news - pardon me...
--Ugen
--- Begin Message ---
Here's a quickie for the people who have been plagued with high bandwidth
syn flood attacks, a kernel patch for FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE which rate limits
SYN processing. I
gt; On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 02:34:55PM -0400, Ugen Antsilevitch wrote:
> > The part that obviously interests me is IPFW - if you guys are
> > interested to put some effort in "real" i.e. stateful firewall
> > to be developed i'd love to offer any help i can.
> >
please disregard..sorry.
--Ugen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> you name an object, but what object you act on. The namespace
> approachhas merit too, and is the basis for the DTE work done at
> TIS a number of
> years ago. You might be interested in taking a look at some of
> the DTE
> papers published at USENIX...
I have seen this work - this is almo
Well.. i just looked through some archives and also on the
recent traffic in freebsd-questions.
It seems there are great many people that have same problem i do - apparently
our beloved system does not support PCI modems? Now if i am wrong here -
kick me and ignore the rest of the message.
If i
Hey!
Thanx a lot first of all!
Anytime i CAN write something myself - i do. I can go as low as networking code
or pseudodevice driver. But i am at loss when it comes to hardware (and within
my scope of work etc. i doubt i will ever learn this stuff). Thats why i pleaded for
help.
I volontee
> > > I volonteer to be your first alpha-tester. I have this modem
> > > blaster thing. It is PCI and it has a UART. I was going to sell it
> > > and shell out lots of money for USRobotics 56K ISA real modem. BTW
> > > they call it "legacy" modem - i think the general direction is such
> > > that
Good day.
This is part one of what is (hopefully) will be my long and hard look in the
IP routing in FreeBSD as we know it. I must admit that i am out of shape on
many subjects and so much of this data may be wrong because of me doing
the Wrong Thing.
Anyway - these are the compressed results of d
Gustavo V G C Rios wrote:
> "Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO" wrote:
>
> > only one :-) performance :-) context switch is a slow operation.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > emax
>
> Excuse me gentleman, who said that ?
> Take time to visit this site: http://www.qnx.com/iat/download/index.html
>
> You'll be intro
13 matches
Mail list logo
