On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:31:27AM -0700, Nick Sayer wrote:
>
> In the scrypto section, I see that the telnet stuff is set aside
> nicely in its own spot. I was able to add my patches just fine,
> but it appears that the Makefiles are somewhere else. Maybe in
> with the kerberos stuff or something
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 09:30:05PM -0400, Jamie Howard wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> > Suppose you have a *write-protected* DOS floppy and you do:
> >
> > # mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /floppy <-- this is OK
> >
> > # cp somefile /floppy <-- a lot of error messages
> >
> >
On Fri, Jul 09, 1999 at 09:13:02PM -0400, Axis wrote:
> I have been using *BSD* for around 3 years now. My problem is thatI have
> always used the console for system administration duties. I really want to
> put a kick *** system together to run X with all of the luxuries.
> I have noticed there is
Am-utils http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/am-utils/ comes with
a nice perl script called automount2amd that does a fine job of
converting sun automount maps to amd maps.
At work we have Solaris, Linux, and FreeBSD all hapily automounting and
talking nis.
I did have to hack automount2amd so FreeB
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 09:30:05PM -0400, Jamie Howard wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> > Suppose you have a *write-protected* DOS floppy and you do:
> >
> > # mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /floppy <-- this is OK
> >
> > # cp somefile /floppy <-- a lot of error messages
> >
>
On Fri, Jul 09, 1999 at 09:13:02PM -0400, Axis wrote:
> I have been using *BSD* for around 3 years now. My problem is thatI have
> always used the console for system administration duties. I really want to
> put a kick *** system together to run X with all of the luxuries.
> I have noticed there i
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:31:27AM -0700, Nick Sayer wrote:
>
> In the scrypto section, I see that the telnet stuff is set aside
> nicely in its own spot. I was able to add my patches just fine,
> but it appears that the Makefiles are somewhere else. Maybe in
> with the kerberos stuff or somethin
At work we have 18 or so web servers runing FreeBSD 3.0 on daul PIIs.
When they see very high loads (~300+) the SMP starts do get confused
and things randomly fail.
Were there signifigant SMP changes from 3.0-RELEASE to 3.3-RELEASE
that may make SMP more stable at high loads? Are their any sign
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 05:51:59PM +0400, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> I have traffic metering program using bpf,
> it works fine on relatevly free net but looses about 30%
> of packets on havy loaded one.
Are you doing dns lookups? Don't do those and you may fix your problem.
>
> Could any body
9 matches
Mail list logo
