mathematica/mathlink/python/linux

2005-12-15 Thread Tony Maher
Hello, I have installed Mathematica (v5.2) on FreeBSD 5-stable. All works fine. I am now trying to get the Python bindings to MathLink to work. I can build ok but it links against the Mathematica library (ML) which is linux. When I import mathlink I get undefined symbol "stdout" message (stdou

Re: mathematica/mathlink/python/linux

2005-12-15 Thread Tony Maher
Hello Mike Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Maher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > >>I have installed Mathematica (v5.2) on FreeBSD 5-stable. All works >>fine. > > Is this a Linux binary, or a FreeBSD one? Linux. I do not believe there is a Fr

Re: Problems with FreeBSD 6.0

2006-04-12 Thread Tony Maher
self as LINUX >>>from uname. >> >>Unless uname is a Linux binary. > > > FreeBSD doesn't ship uname as a Linux binary either :-) > > Kris /compat/linux/bin/uname -a Linux karma.internal 2.4.2 FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Apr 4 22:24:50 EST 2006 i686 i686

Re: struct dirent question

2006-08-16 Thread Tony Maher
Eric Anderson wrote: > On 08/16/06 00:49, Tobias Roth wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:26:13PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: >> >>> Does the ifdef in the struct dirent (pasted in below) make any sense? >>> Seems like regardless of whether the __BSD_VISIBLE is defined or not, >>> the d_name len

Re: Problem installing Mathematica on FreeBSD 6.1

2006-09-12 Thread Tony Maher
Alexey Mikhailov wrote: > I installed Mathematica 5.1 on my FreeBSD 6.1 system. And I can't run it.. > That's very strange behaviour: > > ~/Mathematica/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/Binaries/Linux % ./Mathematica > ./Mathematica: relocation error: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6: undefined > symbol: __stderrp

Re: Problem installing Mathematica on FreeBSD 6.1

2006-09-13 Thread Tony Maher
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:42:07AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote: > > >>I have test installed Mathematica 5.2 and it appears to work fine >>(I do not actually use it except for simple tests) >> >>ldd Mathematica >>Mathematica: >&g

getenv semantics

2005-10-15 Thread Tony Maher
Hello, I am trying to create a port of some 3rd party software and while I can get it to compile ok and (mostly) run there are a few anomalies in it detecting environment variables. It appears to run ok on linux (I do not have a convenient linux box for testing with). I believe its the way the

Re: getenv semantics

2005-10-16 Thread Tony Maher
Thanks for the reference. As I read it FreeBSD is following standard (no surprise ;-) but it would appear other platforms may not be. I'll check this out when I get access to a linux box. Joseph Koshy wrote: From "The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6" http://www.cnop.net/docs/susv3/fun

Re: getenv semantics

2005-10-16 Thread Tony Maher
Danny Braniss wrote: now why would FreeBSD supply sources? from /usr/src/lib/libc/stlib/getenv.c: ... Thanks I have the source but actually checking the call programatically should be better since since it does not rely on my interpretation of code. It also does not help me understand the pro

Re: Fwd: Sun Grid Engine 5.2.3 Available. Now Open Source

2001-07-25 Thread Tony Maher
ch more functionality than NQS (ports/net/generic-nqs) except maybe some graphical interfaces (which I have only seen in the docs so far). Though the documentation is larger (I don't know about better ;-) I'll try to make a port of it but it may take a while. Like generic-nqs it has funny

isp/ispfw

2003-07-31 Thread Tony Maher
Hello I am trying to get a Qlogic 2300 to talk to a SAN under 5.1-Release. I have never played with fiber before so I am not sure of what I am supposed to be doing. The device is recognized ok. ahc0: Features 0x1def6, Bugs 0x40, Flags 0x20485540 aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/25

default route curiosity

2003-10-14 Thread Tony Maher
Hello, this is just for my own curiosity. On the weekend at work, the comms guys rebuilt a router and our freebsd boxes could not talk to database server in a different subnet for a few hours. The router upgrade failed so upgrade was backed out and routes eventually re-established. All seemed we

Re: Fwd: FreeBSD port of SGE

2002-04-03 Thread Tony Maher
Hello, > Someone also started the SGE port to FreeBSD (which > means duplicated work), so you are interested, or if > you want to be the maintainer of the ports (currently, > we have FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Darwin/MacOSX), > please contact me. I started a port a few months ago and recently sta