- Original Message -
From: "Joe Auty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Kip Macy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ;
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: kernel panic at boot on any 6.x OS
>
> Any idea how this could have happened after disabl
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Auty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kip Macy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ;
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 10:39 P
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Joe Auty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kip Macy" <[EMAIL PROTECT
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Auty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kip Macy"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ;
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:01
Hi All,
I have a pager monitoring system built on FreeBSD 6.4 that uses the
ltmdm driver.
(ltmdm is a "controllerless winmodem")
I was looking into updating to FreeBSD 8 and I see that ltmdm and
hcfmdm are now
both broken. hcfmdm broke on FreeBSD 7 but it is easily patched to
build on tha
On 4/24/2010 8:29 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message:<20100424102255.12d78...@ernst.jennejohn.org>
Gary Jennejohn writes:
: On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:27:12 -0700
: Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
:
:>Setting aside the question of why do we break software that a lot of
:>
some hard choices and select 2 or at most 3
CDROM vendors who clearly DON'T step on each other's markets, and who
clearly want to have the business, and designate them "Blessed" and let
the CD distributors alone to repair all the damage done by this last fiasco.
Then in a y
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pietro Cerutti
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:42 AM
> To: FreeBSD; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: problem due to hostname change
>
>
>
> Well I double check once more on my system!
>
Unle
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:19 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: FYI
>
>
>> Doug, in the enti
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:10 AM
>To: void
>Cc: Mike Smith; Ted Mittelstaedt; Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant;
>MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FYI
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mike Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:46 AM
>To: Doug Hass
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FYI
>
>
>> >
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:20 AM
>To: Mike Smith
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FYI
>
>I'm glad
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
>Behalf Of Louis A. Mamakos
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:31 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: void; Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Imagestream WanI
>-Original Message-
>From: Bill Fumerola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:13 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Doug Hass; Mike Smith; Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FYI
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Smith
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 10:32 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Doug Hass; Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subjec
how I feel.
I'm glad that ET is out there selling cards to the FreeBSD community but I
wouldn't spend money on them as long as a source-freely-available alternative
was around.
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of: The FreeB
ILL selling the RISCom series of cards which is
the predecessor to the WANic, uses the same controller, these are ISA cards
that have a design that's over 10 years old.
You tell your supplier that since the 405 is being "phased out" that he
should sell you a bunch of them at clos
ir Linux/expensive WANic router business.
The rumor that the WANic405 is going away is totally unsubstantiated by
the facts and if it ever did then Linux would see immediate benefit because
the FreeBSD OS would end up losing one more of the few cards that it has
that supports a T1. So consider who
e soon, and until they do there will be plenty of demand for
devices that interface to them. The T1 and the E1 aren't going to go any
faster and so there's no need to change the capacity of the serial interface
controllers that interface to them. In short, synchronous seri
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 10:40 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards
>
>
>The Cisco 2600 series is g
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 6:33 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards
>
>
>:on the Internet has
There are other vendors that sell the WanIC than Imagestream. I realize
that you see yourself as the only supplier but this isn't true.
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MurrayTaylor
>Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 5:05 PM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: WanIC 405 _IS_ End of Life -- what are the (netgraph
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hass
>Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 7:23 PM
>To: Jim Bryant
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred
>Shippen
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Soren Kristensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:17 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: WanIC 405 _IS_ End of Life -- what are the (netgraph) based
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: Poul-Henning Kamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:05 AM
>To: Soren Kristensen
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: WanIC 405 _IS_ End of Life -- what are
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Poul-Henning
>Kamp
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:53 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Soren Kristensen; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: WanIC 4
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrew C. Hornback [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:59 PM
>To: Doug Hass; Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred Shippen
>Subject: RE: FYI
>
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:53 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred Shippen
>Subject: RE: FYI
>
Hi Doug,
I'm going to a
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:04 AM
>To: Leo Bicknell
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred
>Shippen
>Subject: Re: FYI
>
>
>>
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:56 AM
>To: Leo Bicknell
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FYI
>
>
>In a private e-mail,
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hass
>Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:28 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: FYI
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Elischer
>Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:29 PM
>To: Doug Hass
>Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred
>S
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hass
>Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:54 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: FYI
>
>-Original Message-
>From: void [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:22 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards
>
>
>On Sat, Oct 13, 20
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
>Behalf Of Louis A. Mamakos
>Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:43 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: void; Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Imagestream WanI
advantage, and companies that just simply
don't release source, period. It's quite possible to do controlled releases
where you implement some new idea in a binary module and keep it binary for a
few years, then when you have made your profit on it you open it up, because
by then you have
d.
But none of this matters to the general technical public because what most of
those people do is find a FAQ that contains a recipe for what they want to
be doing and follow that.
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of: The Fr
>-Original Message-
>From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:01 AM
>To: Ted Mittelstaedt
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Netgraph
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 30
39 matches
Mail list logo
