I am intrested in this as well.
> Hello!
>
> I've seen various postings on the Net where people reported
> network-related and overall performance improvements caused
> by settig HZ kernel option to 1000 (for example), that is,
> reducing a tick size to 1ms for their FreeBSD and Linux
> systems.
I'm going to benchmark different network senarious with different options
to see what I can get, and what works best. If someone wants to help me
out, I could maybe write up a article about it?
> I've used a large collection of PCs running somewhat real-time network
> analysis with a HZ set at 5
ith Gigabit Ethernet and NFS in the mix, anything that gets latency
> out is a very good thing :-) and would improve performance.
>
> MJM
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Silbersack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Storms of Perfection" <
I am looking for some more in-dept tuning related articles that go beyond
the scope of the tuning(5) document that is currently on FreeBSD.
I am looking for some extra resources that deal with the following:
Compiler Flags
VM Subsystem Tuning
Network Tuning
And anything else that might be of rel
4 matches
Mail list logo
