Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2))

1999-07-16 Thread Sean Witham
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > > It would be nice to have a way to indicate that, a la SIGDANGER. > > Ok, everybody is avoiding this, so I'll comment. Yes, this would be > interesting, and a good implementation will very probably be > committed. *BUT*, this is not as useful as it seems. Since the

Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2))

1999-07-16 Thread Sean Witham
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > > It would be nice to have a way to indicate that, a la SIGDANGER. > > Ok, everybody is avoiding this, so I'll comment. Yes, this would be > interesting, and a good implementation will very probably be > committed. *BUT*, this is not as useful as it seems. Since the