On Wednesday 05 October 2011 10:46:47 Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 04.10.2011 22:47, Sean M. Collins пишет:
> > I've never heard of the utility until you mentioned it.
> >
> > I'd nuke it, since really there are more popular alternatives like Redis
> > and Memcached in the ports tree that most people
> > > Idea 1: Fix 'n' PRs, get a tee-shirt, fridge magnet, plush daemon, ...
> > >
> > > Idea 2: Give it status. Set up a web page with PR fixing stats
> > >
> > > name/handle..total PRs fixed...fixed in last 12 months...average
> > > fixed/year Sheldon..150...90.
On Sunday 04 March 2012 02:29:08 Brandon Falk wrote:
> > If you define WITHOUT_GCC, a cc isn't created in
> > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin but if you go into the directory and do a
> > symbolic link from clang, and restart make with -DNO_CLEAN it'll work
> > and complete. One of the programs hardc
On 06/04/12 03:12, Chris wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2012 20:50:59 -0300
Mario Lobo wrote:
On Sunday 27 May 2012 14:05:16 Yuri wrote:
On 05/27/2012 10:01, David Wolfskill wrote:
So, at least in my case, I respectfully disagree with the
assessment in the Subject.
i386 is one difference (I use amd6
Hi all.. I found the same problem recently, but I also found someone's post on
the Internet that suggested a change to
the /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/engine/eng_cryptodev.c file. I made the
change to the file and it definitely does force openssl to use the crypto
hardware. I am not sure if
On Saturday 21 June 2008 14:44:02 Anish Mistry wrote:
> On Friday 20 June 2008, joe mcguckin wrote:
> > I'm looking for a cheap and small embedded platform to use as a
> > portable vpn endpoint. It doesn't have to be fast, it just has to
> > run *BSD.
> >
> > Any suggestions??
>
> www.pcengines.ch
On Sunday 22 June 2008 19:20:41 Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
> On FreeBSD 7, OpenSSL does not use the cryptodev engine by default. This
> is a known problem. See
> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/hackers/2008-06/msg00076.ht
>ml
>
> openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -elapsed -engine crypt
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd;a=summary
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff
> Sent: 27 June 2008 14:59
> To: Sean Cavanaugh
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: 3D
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if you guys could comment or give guidance
to the following question: By watching the threads here and also in the CVS
commit group, I see there has been (or will be) a change to the way the
kernel addresses memory. Specifically in its ability to
Hi all,
Does anyone know if there are any IPv6 CVS servers for FreeBSD? (As in
receiving the STABLE and ports branches) I currently use cvs.freebsd.org but
it dosent have an record.
Ta
Peg
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
h
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Sperling
> Sent: 05 August 2008 11:51
> To: Maxim Konovalov
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Pegasus Mc Cleaft; Tim Clewlow
> Subject: Re: IPv6 CVS
>
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Chadwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 August 2008 13:28
> To: Pegasus Mc Cleaft
> Cc: 'Stefan Sperling'; 'Maxim Konovalov'; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org;
> 'Tim Clewlow'
> Subject: Re: IPv
On Thursday 07 August 2008 19:47:31 David Malone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> > The problem is cvsupd - since it's written in Modula3 and doesn't
> > support IPv6 you have to use an inetd/netcat hack to accept IPv6
> > connections on the server. As mentione
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if anyone knows if there is planned an update to the
binutils
for the base system planned?
The reason why I'm asking is (occasionally) I use a later gcc then what
comes
with the system to take advantage of the newer opcodes in the Core 2.
Unf
On Monday 25 August 2008 12:52:48 Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> If you have an Intel ICH chipset and the ichwd driver doesn't work for
> you, please test this patch :
Oliver,
Thanks for the patch, but sadly this didnt help the situation I have
with my
motherboard. It ident
On Sunday 28 September 2008 21:42:41 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:43:58AM +, Pegasus McCleaft wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing this problem. I have
> > recently reloaded my machine (due to a meltdown of my primary boot
> > drive) and noticed t
On Sunday 28 September 2008 23:37:09 Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Yea.. The machine is otherwise running fine, and also loaded the driver
> > for the ata raid controller (I made the machine boot off a raid-1 pack
> > and made slices on the pack for /, /usr, /var . The rest zfs for
> > /usr/home)
>
On Monday 29 September 2008 05:07:13 Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Bruce Cran wrote:
> > I'm also seeing this problem on my amd64 7.1-PRERELEASE system:
> >> atacontrol list
> >
> > ATA channel 0:
> > Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI revision 5
> > Slave: no device present
> > atacontrol: ioctl(I
Again I would like to extend my thanks to everyone who helped with this
problem, and a special thank you Jeremy and Bruce for trying to sus out where
the fault might be.
Your input and support is deeply appreciated.
Peg
> -Original Message-
> From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav [mailto:[EMAIL
On Saturday 11 October 2008 21:53:35 Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > On 10/11/08, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> With regards to the traditional BSD partitioning scheme, having a
> >> separate /usr, /home, /tmp, etc... there's no reason to
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 19:32:47 Srinivas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a small doubt.
>
> Suppose I have a PCI card with a general purpose CPU on it. Could it be
> able to communicate with another PCI device or ISA device(lets say IDE hard
> disk)?
Hi Srinivas,
Others may have a differe
Hi everyone,
I am having difficulties rebuilding the world after some patches were made
today. I was wondering if anyone else is experiencing the same troubles?
ld -static -N --gc-sections -nostdlib -m elf_i386_fbsd -Ttext 0x0 -o
gptzfsboot.out /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/gptzfsboot/../
0 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
> >>
> >> "Pegasus Mc Cleaft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >
Hello Hackers,
I noticed something the other day that I thought was a bit weird. I had
a
high amount of HD activity, so I wanted to see who was on my machine. I tried
using the "who" command and received no information (not even for myself).
I have found that various methods
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:19:40 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > Hello Hackers,
> >
>
> `who' works perfectly fine for me on CURRENT/AMD64 synced up 3 days
> ago, via an ssh terminal. Can you provide more
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:42:08 you wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Monday 24 November 2008 02:19:40 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wro
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Rabson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Olivier SMEDTS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pegasus Mc Cleaft"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pascal Hofstee" <
Hello Hackers,
I was wondering if anyone knows a work around for this.
I have added a log device to one of my zfs pools (it is a unused ATA
drive
slice that has no activity on it after boot up as most other directories live
in there own zfs filing systems). I have added a SSD
On Friday 28 November 2008 17:14:33 Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I forward my orginal mail to freebsd-questions. I hope someone can
> shed some light here...
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Fernando Apesteguía <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:33 AM
>
Hello hackers,
I was wondering if there is a work around for this...
In 8.0-current I have installed the new version of ZFS and upgraded the
filing systems to 13. I had a thought that I would make a zfs for /tmp and set
the exec to no (thinking that nothing should ever be exec
Hello Hackers,
Recently and friend and I have been trying to get the new gptzfsboot
working
on our machines and ran into a interesting problem.
Initially I was building the world without the environment variable
LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=YES in the /etc/make.conf and this, of course
On Sunday 07 December 2008 09:22:16 Doug Rabson wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2008, at 03:19, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > Hello Hackers,
> >
> > Recently and friend and I have been trying to get the new
> > gptzfsboot working
> > on our machines and ran into a interesting
- Original Message -
From: "Andriy Gapon"
To: ;
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:11 PM
Subject: ich watchdog vs intel smm code
Some time earlier I reported that ichwd driver doesn't produce any
effect on my system with Intel DG33TL motherboard when watchdog timer is
allowed to ex
Hi Current & Hackers,
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing this problem: Any use of
bsdtar to
create a new archive causes the process to be unresponsive to all signals and
consumes 100% cpu time. The machine I am testing on is a Core 2 quad running
in AMD64 (8 gigs ram, zfs boot,
Hi Adrian,
I am not sure, but I didnt think ZFS 13 was ever going to be merged into
7-stable. I thought the kernel memory requirements were to great (just going
back in my memory on that one). Also, I think there are still a few bugs
left with the zil being enabled (and/or prefetch) causing
Hi Current and Hackers,
I have only seen this recently and was wondering if anyone else can
confirm
this as a bug or perhaps a setup problem on my end. I think it started to
appear with 8-Current from about the 25th of march.
Any time I do a ping6 or traceroute6 I receive an e
Hi Hajimu,
> ken> Any time I do a ping6 or traceroute6 I receive an error stating
> "Invalid ken> value for hints." However, I am able to do all other
> functions (telnet, ssh, ken> etc.)
>
> ken> feathers# ping6 ipv6.google.com
> ken> ping6: Invalid value for hints
>
> ken> feathers# traceroute
Hi Hackers,
I was wondering if someone could give me some advice. I just updated one of
my servers from 7.2-pre to 7.2-stable (07/05/2009) and lost my IPv6
connectivity. The machine has been given a static IPv6 address and ND is not
used (I set the address in the rc.conf file). On reboot,
Hello Current,
I dont know if there is a current issue with other systems or if it is
localized to me, but ever since > r195914 I am getting a fatal trap on boot.
The process is always in the swapper and is always a 12.
System is AMD64 Core2-Quad, 4 Gigs, gptzfsboot from a mirr
ACK! Sorry.. I messed up the revision number in the message body...
On Monday 27 July 2009 21:18:22 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> I dont know if there is a current issue with other systems or if it is
> localized to me, but ever since > r195914 I am getting a fata
Crud! Just shoot me! I'm very sorry about this.. Typing to fast and not
checking..
On Monday 27 July 2009 21:23:36 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> ACK! Sorry.. I messed up the revision number in the message body...
>
> On Monday 27 July 2009 21:18:22 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> >
Hello Current and Hackers,
With the recent changes to /etc/rc.d for network start-up. I was
wondering
what is now correct. The previously working ipv6 configuration no longer
creates a static default route, and I have not been able to figure out why.
After boot, if I manually add the
On Sunday 13 September 2009 18:58:02 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > With the recent changes to /etc/rc.d for network start-up. I was
> > wondering what is now correct. The previously working ipv6 configuration
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Mario Lobo wrote:
> > [...]
> > It's compiling right now.
> >
> > I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right
> > after the next reboot.
>
> So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious
> if the ne
Hello Hackers & Current,
I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate
set
of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
independently of a ports build?
Right now, I use the base GCC to compile the world and kernel, and
GCC44
for
On Sunday 25 April 2010 11:17:40 Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sat, 24.04.2010 at 16:42:37 +0000, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> > It may already be implemented, but it would be nice if there was
> > something defined while the kernel and/or world is being built to that a
> > n
46 matches
Mail list logo
