On 11/06/10 01:04, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> Just to add to that (because I do find it a novel idea), 1) how
>>> are you going to properly prevent man in the middle attacks (SSL, TLS,
>>> etc?), and 2) what webserver would you use?
>>
>> ht
On 01/12/11 02:39, Super Bisquit wrote:
http://slexy.org/view/s2NSVy7aTU
The build also fails looking for machine/specialreg.h. This file is only
found on i386/amd64 processors. Drm.ko is needed by agp.ko.
DRM is not required by AGP, rather the reverse, and DRM does not
presently work on powe
7;s a Quicksilver 2002 with a
4x agp slot.
Now, how do I make it work? That's the problem I've been recently asking about.
Forgive me for bringing the next part here.
The PowerPC snapshot 9 for the 32bit ppc needs updating. The ports
tarball is behind.
On 1/12/11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On
On 03/28/11 15:59, dieter...@engineer.com wrote:
From what I know, one or the other can only be as
the first entry and it then has to be set from the forth prompt.
So, you will need two disks to boot , saya: OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD,
Linux,
and MacOSX or a combination of these.
On PPC boxe
On 03/30/11 10:23, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-03-29 23:20, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
So here's what I'm pondering. When I build a library, like e.g. libc,
where do the include files get pulled from? They can't (shouldn't) be
the ones in /usr/include, but I don't see a -nostdinc like for the
k
On 04/22/11 11:50, Devin Teske wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Best [mailto:arun...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 8:42 AM
To: Devin Teske
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org; 'Teske,
Devin'
Subject: Re: [UPDATE] host-setup(1): a dialog(1)-b
On 05/31/11 18:18, Warner Losh wrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I am looking into potentially MFC'ing r212367 and related, that adds
drains to sbufs. The reason for MFC is that several pieces of new
code in CURRENT are using the drain functionality and it would make
On 05/31/11 19:06, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 17:18:16 -0600
Warner Losh wrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 5:07 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
I am looking into potentially MFC'ing r212367 and related, that adds
drains to sbufs. The reason for MFC is that several pieces of new
code i
On 07/12/11 16:06, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/7/12 Alexander Kabaev:
Whatever happened to using a proper cross-tool to do the job?
Why would one need to build a cross-compiler in order to compile
userland-agnostic code for the same CPU architecture? This would be
like requiring a cross-compiler
On 07/12/11 17:33, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/7/12 Nathan Whitehorn:
On 07/12/11 16:06, Robert Millan wrote:
Why would one need to build a cross-compiler in order to compile
userland-agnostic code for the same CPU architecture? This would be
like requiring a cross-compiler in order to build
On 07/21/11 10:42, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Where does "make release" place the disk images (iso's) by default
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
On 08/30/11 07:27, Ivan Voras wrote:
Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to
manually create the partition scheme?
1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition type ("invalid
argument")
2) it doesn't recognize that I have actually created a root (/) mount
point
On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 30.8.2011. 16:11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/30/11 07:27, Ivan Voras wrote:
Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to
manually create the partition scheme?
1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition
On 08/31/11 05:19, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 31/08/2011 02:40, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote:
It was a plain install on a RAID volume which appears as ordinary da0
drive. I did do a couple of start-overs so it could be that some state
got lost. It definitely did NOT
On 08/31/11 08:28, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 31 August 2011 14:45, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
It does let you set mountpoints, and displays them, and always has, but not
for bsdlabel container partitions (MBR type "freebsd"), since they aren't
filesystems. Is this what you were tryin
On 09/12/11 14:13, Ivan Voras wrote:
Unfortunately, I continue to have problems with the partitioner part of
the installer in the BETA2 image. See the (unchanged) problem
screenshots here:
http://ivoras.imgur.com/freebsd_installer_2
See also the screenshots of the entire process here (on BETA1)
On 10/01/11 04:25, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Adrian Chadd wrote:
What happens if this occurs:
* cpu_idle() is entered
* you enter critical_enter() and call cpu_idleclock()
* an interrupt occurs, scheduling an immediate callout
* .. but you've already set the clock register, so it won't be
ser
On 12/08/11 03:01, Piotr Nowak wrote:
We're working on PowerPC target using GCC 4.2.1
and FreeBSD 6.1. It seems like we have similar
problem. In our case GCC sometimes very unfortunately
optimize code with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
Example shown below covers file sys/powerc/booke/pmap.c
and funct
On 01/22/12 11:11, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Devin Teske
To:
Cc:
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:42:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Change of ftp download server's dir layout, from 9
On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:01 AM, wrote:
Example:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases
On 02/21/12 02:24, ego...@ramattack.net wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade my Jumpstart services for provisioning machines,
but I'm founding that in FreeBSD 9.0 things are become slightly
different than in previous releases. For example... tar -C ... -pxvf
does not work with some files (althou
On 04/15/12 16:27, Mahesh Babu wrote:
1. How to find in which core the given process is running?
You can see it in top.
2. How to force a process to run in a particular core? for example: I need to
run process ID 1200 in core 2.
Use cpuset. You can either run it in the first place on core
On 06/12/12 18:00, Richard Yao wrote:
On 06/11/12 18:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Brandon Falk wrote:
Greetings,
I was just wondering what it is that FreeBSD does that makes it take so long
to boot. Booting into Ubuntu minimal or my own custom Linux distro,
liter
On 06/13/12 13:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:14:09AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 23:45 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:51:34AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 22:45 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
First,
il
If you find deficiencies, I am certain that the OpenRC developers would
appreciate feedback regarding them.
On 06/13/12 10:19, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/12/12 18:00, Richard Yao wrote:
On 06/11/12 18:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Brandon Falk wrote:
Greetin
On 06/17/12 19:43, Mike Meyer wrote:
Eric McCorkle wrote:
The -m32 flag seems to be the culprit; removing it fixes the problem.
This is why I was having problems, as the offsets in EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE
were wrong.
In any case, this is a pretty serious error, and someone should try to
reproduce
On 08/21/12 08:44, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 4:49:30 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:32:41PM -0600, Dan McGregor wrote:
Hi.
I've been working on porting compiler-rt/clang's support for address
sanitization (asan) to FreeBSD. So far I have it buil
On 11/18/12 01:31, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:05:40PM -0800, Perry Hutchison wrote:
[trimmed some of the lists]
Chris Rees wrote:
... git doesn't work with our workflow.
I'm sure the workflow itself is documented somewhere, but is
there a good writeup of _how_ git
On 05/25/13 13:26, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 25/05/2013 17:15, Matt Olander wrote:
From my vague recollection, we discussed improving bsdinstall by tying
it in with pc-sysinstall, which we've been threatening to do for at
least a year. Also, there was much discussion about Devin's bsdconfig
perhaps
On 05/27/13 16:23, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 27/05/2013 21:28, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 11:40 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
Yes.
Is this a joke?
It probably /was/ too short a reply. Personally I think there should
be a single UI and scripting interface across all platforms. We should
try and
On 05/27/13 20:40, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 2:23 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 27/05/2013 21:28, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 11:40 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
Yes.
Is this a joke?
It probably /was/ too short a reply. Personally I think there should
be a single UI and scripting interf
On 05/27/13 23:36, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 6:53 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 05/27/13 20:40, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 2:23 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 27/05/2013 21:28, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 11:40 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
Yes.
Is this a joke?
It probably
PowerPC hypervisors typically provided a restricted range on memory when
the MMU is disabled, as it is when initially handling exceptions. In
order to restore virtual memory, the powerpc64 code needs to read a data
structure called the SLB cache, which is currently allocated out of a
UMA zone, and
On 09/05/10 22:51, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
> wrote:
>
>> PowerPC hypervisors typically provided a restricted range on memory when
>> the MMU is disabled, as it is when initially handling exceptions. In
>> order to
Now that my SLB allocation issue is solved, with help with Matthew and
Alan, I have another VM puzzler.
I have a simple program that tries to use all the memory on the system,
which isn't very much on the PS3, so I use it to test swap as well.
Shortly after it begins paging, the system locks up co
On 09/06/10 20:22, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Now that my SLB allocation issue is solved, with help with Matthew and
> Alan, I have another VM puzzler.
>
> I have a simple program that tries to use all the memory on the system,
> which isn't very much on the PS3, so I use it
On 09/06/10 22:24, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 09/06/10 20:22, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
>> Now that my SLB allocation issue is solved, with help with Matthew and
>> Alan, I have another VM puzzler.
>>
>> I have a simple program that tries to use all the memory
On 09/16/10 09:42, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Alexander Best wrote:
>
>> On Wed Sep 15 10, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>> Warren Block wrote:
>>> > [...]
>>> > 8. Alexander Motin has an updated CAM version of the ATA system which
>>> > will eventually replace the existing one. In -CURRE
On 10/24/10 11:14, Garrett Cooper wrote:
well on i386/amd (pc98?) you could use i386_get_ioperm(2) to check for proper
io permissions.
Yeah, and it's x86 specific. Kind of curious why there isn't a
more generalized name for this API, but it appeared to be geared
towards x86 (today,
We currently detect the offical "text" and "data" addresses for ELF
files in kern/imgact_elf.c by the heuristic of calling whichever section
contains the executable's entry point the text section and everything
else data. In general, both this concept and the very few things that
use them are o
In order to properly implement exec_setregs() on powerpc64, I must
hand-relocate the function descriptor pointed to by the executable entry
point. To do this, exec_setregs() must be passed the relocation base of
the executable, which would originally come from the image_params struct.
The patc
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 3:29:23 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
We currently detect the offical "text" and "data" addresses for ELF
files in kern/imgact_elf.c by the heuristic of calling whichever section
contains the executable's entry p
On 09/04/13 02:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 04.09.2013 00:48, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
wrote:
Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it
on, to
he
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the
porting work?
-Nathan
#define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used)
GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in total to the total
On 09/04/13 11:00, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do
the
porting work
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Peter Jeremy wrote:
I have a system with 4GB RAM and hence need to use an amd64 kernel to use
all the RAM (I can only access 3GB RAM with an i386 kernel). OTOH, amd64
processes are significantly (50-100%) larger than equivalent i386 processes
and none none of the applicat
45 matches
Mail list logo
