n/test[8]: test: argument expected
I think this patch is correct in that it does fix the problem, and the
TEST.sh and TEST.csh regression scripts report the same results pre and
post-patch. Comments?
http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/text.c.diff
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team
I noticed something weird with test(1) when I ran across a problem port
Makefile. Our test(1) doesn't properly check to make sure there is an
operand argument to unary operators like -f. For example:
test -f
Will print "TRUE" on FreeBSD. On Solaris, it will die:
/usr/bin/test[8]: test: argume
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:08 -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Apr 05), Joe Marcus Clarke said:
> > I noticed something weird with test(1) when I ran across a problem port
> > Makefile. Our test(1) doesn't properly check to make sure there is an
> >
able media and desktop systems.
I'm not a src committer, so this isn't a threat to commit. I'm more
interested in getting feedback, and hopefully some src committer
interest. I think this would really benefit desktop FreeBSD.
http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/usermount.diff
J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Colin Percival wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>> I know we have vfs.usermount, but this is not always sufficient since
>> the user has to own the mount point in question. What I propose is to
>> add a ``user'' mount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>
>> I know we have vfs.usermount, but this is not always sufficient since
>> the user has to own the mount point in question. What I propose is to
>> add a
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 08:30 +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > What I'd like to achieve is a simple out-of-the-box way of mounting
> > media such as CDs, and floppy disks without users necessarily needing to
> > know about sysctl. While I can
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 23:30 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>
> >> I would suggest that an extremely careful security audit of the userspace
> >> and kernel mount and unmount code is due -- especially things like the
> &
et this at all, and ntfs set this to all flags (not
just those visible to statfs(2)). By fixing this, umount(8) works
properly on relative paths to user mount points for those three file
systems.
http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/usermount.diff
Comments?
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 11:13 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> >
> > //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/homes/home/%u/smb_homesmbfsrw,noauto,user
> > 0 0
> >
> > Then, a user could just run, for example:
> >
> > mount /hom
d, I would like to add a /media to FreeBSD. I would like to
add this to hier(7) as well as BSD.root.mtree. Would this be
permissible? Thanks.
Joe
- --
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
-BEGIN PGP
, I don't understand enough of the linker to know what it is.
Thanks.
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Kabaev wrote:
| On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:06:44AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
|
|>This is something that's been bothering me for a while, ever since I
|>fixed the symbol conflicts in Mozilla with -Bsymbolic. Why do we no
if it succeeds? Thanks.
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 15:02, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote this message on Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 20:33 -0500:
> > I'm trying to figure out the best way to programmatically test to see if
> > a disc device is a DVD device. That is, how can I tell the differe
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 16:07, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote this message on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 15:08 -0500:
> > > Take a look at cdrecord and see what that does... But that might
> > > require you to use atapi-cam instead of the "normal" atapi
t
5.X. I'm hoping not to have to link every GTK+ app that might use the
new file selector to PTHREAD_LIBS. Any advice would be greatly
appreciated. Thanks.
Joe
--
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.Free
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 17:08, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>
> > I have a problem I'm hoping someone can help me with. GTK+ 2.4
> > introduced a new file selection GUI which works just fine in threaded
> > and non-threaded appl
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 09:18, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 17:08, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a problem I&#x
What is the canonical way for a userland application to get the
fully-qualified path of an executable from its running PID? I know I
can do a readlink(2) on /proc/pid/file, but procfs is deprecated on 5.X,
correct? Is there a more appropriate way to do this? Thanks.
Joe
--
PGP Key : http://ww
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 11:12, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jul 20), Joe Marcus Clarke said:
> > What is the canonical way for a userland application to get the
> > fully-qualified path of an executable from its running PID? I know I
> > can do a readlink(2) o
I've noticed something I think is strange with gcc, the -shared flag,
and -pthread on -STABLE. I'm hoping someone can enlighten me as to why
this happens or if it's a bug. If I compile something with the
following command, I do not see libc_r.so linked in the resulting
object:
cc -shared -pthrea
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 18:05, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:18:52PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > I've noticed something I think is strange with gcc, the -shared flag,
> > and -pthread on -STABLE. I'm hoping someone can enlighten me as to w
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 12:18, Aeefyu wrote:
> With reference to:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-hackers&m=105593188923273&w=2
>
> i.e. Broadcom 440x NIC support for FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x (as found on
> latest Dell's Notebooks - mine is a 8500)
>
> Would anyone be so kind to enlighten me
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 03:21, Duncan Barclay wrote:
> From: "Aeefyu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-hackers&m=105593188923273&w=2
> >
> > I cant compile the above on my machine
> > Its only applicable for 5.x and not 4.x?
> > Sighs
>
> Correct, at present i
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:56, Duncan Barclay wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think I have fixed the RX packet loss and memory corruption problems with
> the previous version of the driver. Please try the code at
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~dmlb/bcm-0308252140.tar.gz
>
> I have manged to get full link speed
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 09:27, James Nobis wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:40:25 +0100, Duncan Barclay wrote:
> > > Hello James and Ken,
> > >
> > > Both of you are having real problems with the bcm driver and both of you
> > > have a Dell 8500.
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 02:33, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
>
> >
> > 1. (kde side) Anyone, would you please make a patch for
> >nspluginscane to look /usr/X11R6/lib/browsers_plugins?
> > or
> > 2. (pluginwrapper side) If 1 is no, I'll install F
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 03:20, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 02:33, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >
> >>Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> 1. (kde side) Anyone, would you please make a pat
29 matches
Mail list logo
