to these lines:
pptp2:
new -i ng1 pptp2 pptp2
set ipcp ranges 192.168.0.200/32 192.168.0.221/32
log +pptp +pptp2
hope this helps..
Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
to any process,
but if you try to run timidity, it says "/dev/dsp busy". I have killed esd
and made it work, but not always. I don't know what that my mean.
-Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Is liibgcc_a not supposed to be on 5.1? Are the functions in some
other library?
Sorry to bother, but Google is silent!
Thanks,
--
Jim Durham
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe
On Friday 23 January 2004 07:50 am, Bogdan TARU wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> I am experiencing kernel panics on a poweredge 2650 each day around
> 3am (usually the machine comes up at 3:04am). The kernel panics are
> reproductable by running: /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid (in
> fact by
I have had this problem now with at least 3 FreeBSD servers over a period of
about 2 years. I had put it down to some hardware problem but it seems to be
too much of a coincidence with 3 different machines doing the same thing.
The first time was when I put 4.5-RELEASE on a brand new Dell Powere
On Friday 01 October 2004 12:36 pm, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Jim Durham writes:
> | I have had this problem now with at least 3 FreeBSD servers over a period
> | of about 2 years. I had put it down to some hardware problem but it seems
> | to be too much of a coincidence with 3 differ
On Friday 01 October 2004 06:38 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:03:00AM -0400, Jim Durham wrote:
> > I have had this problem now with at least 3 FreeBSD servers over a period
> > of about 2 years. I had put it down to some hardware problem but it seems
> >
On Friday 01 October 2004 06:38 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Do you have ddb enabled?
I just recompiled the kernel (4.10 patchlevel 3) and installed it. It's in use
right now and I can't reboot it, but it may do so for me! 8- ). If not,
I'll do it early tommorow AM. I used options DDB and DD
On Friday 01 October 2004 11:34 pm, Bruce R. Montague wrote:
> Hi, re:
> > The odd thing was that it was happening at virtualy
> > the same time every morning
> > [...]
> > Then, they both just *stopped doing it by themselves* with no apparent
> > correlation to anything installed software-wis
On Saturday 02 October 2004 06:42 pm, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:50:26 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.hackers you
>
> wrote:
> >On Oct 1, 2004, at 7:23 PM, Jim Durham wrote:
> >> These are very rare except they seem to happen about once a day
> >&g
On Monday 04 October 2004 03:06 pm, Doug Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Jim Durham wrote:
> > The reboots started out happening at 5.15 pm or so. I had them unplug the
> > server completely from AC and restart it and now it's happening withing a
> > few mi
On Monday 04 October 2004 04:04 pm, Jim Durham wrote:
> On Monday 04 October 2004 03:06 pm, Doug Russell wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Jim Durham wrote:
> > > The reboots started out happening at 5.15 pm or so. I had them unplug
> > > the server completely from AC
I know that only security fixes are supposed to go in RELENG_4, but
the recent changes in the TCP stuff seem important enough that
perhaps they could be put in RELENG_4 for those of us who run
productions servers on -RELEASE ?
--
Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:17 pm, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > I know that only security fixes are supposed to go in RELENG_4,
> > but
>
> You mean RELENG_4_4 I assume. RELENG_4 gets a lot more than just
> security fixes.
>
> - Jordan
Duh... right. OGS..(Old Guy Syndrome). I actually just did a
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 03:40 pm, Jim Durham wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:17 pm, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > > I know that only security fixes are supposed to go in RELENG_4,
> > > but
> >
> > You mean RELENG_4_4 I assume. RELENG_4 gets a lot
put the patches into 4.4-RELEASE, and give it a try
on my "test" box here at home before putting the changes into the 4.4's at
work.
I appreciate the hard work. Thanks.
--
Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 01:19 pm, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 11:48:52AM -0500, Jim Durham wrote:
> > I know that only security fixes are supposed to go in RELENG_4, but
> > the recent changes in the TCP stuff seem important enough that
> > perhaps
. Is the patch that Dave applied to 4.2 applicable to
4.4-RELEASE? It sounded like not. I applied the tcp_output.c and
uipc_socket.c patch to my 4.4-RELEASE servers and it made a whole lot of
difference, like 500KB/sto 954KB/s from my old P200 server to my laptop.
Thanks.
--
Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
After reading that really great article last night on opensource.org
about the SCO thing , I tried to bring it up tonight and it looks
like both their nameservers are down.
nslookup returns unknow host/domain.
Makes you wonder
--
-Jim
___
[EMAI
I'm wondering about the characteristics of the redirect_address option
of natd. I tried this on -questions, but no one replied, so I thought
I'd ask on here, hoping to find folks more familiar with kernel
mechanisms here.
Consider a FreeBSD NAT "gateway" between a public IP on one network
inte
On Friday 25 July 2003 08:22 pm, Clement Laforet wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:49:38 -0400
> Jim Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm wondering about the characteristics of the redirect_address
> > option
> >
> > of natd. I
On Saturday 26 July 2003 03:13 am, you wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 02:22:05AM +0200, Clement Laforet wrote:
> > for incoming traffic, you must use -redirect_address, but for
> > outgoing you have to set -alias_address.
> > If you want to use a specific public IP to map incoming AND
> > outgoin
On Saturday 26 July 2003 03:42 am, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:49:38PM -0400, Jim Durham wrote:
> > The procedure we used was to alias a 2nd public address to the
> > outside interface and use a redirect_address statement in
> > natd.conf to redirect c
On Saturday 26 July 2003 04:07 am, Wouter Clarie wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > Could you check if TELNET, HTTP, or SSH from the outside world to
> > the inside machine works? The problem may have to do with VNC
> > protocol peculiarities preventing it from working through NAT
On Monday 28 July 2003 06:26 am, you wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Jim Durham wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 July 2003 03:10 am, Wouter Clarie wrote:
> > > Yes, that's what I meant. It should work, since it does here.
> > > VNC Server on the internal network, accessed f
up, even
though I have:
permpass0 0666
permacd0c 0666
permlpt00666
in /etc/devfs.conf. The first two rules work. The rule for lpt0 does
not.
BTW, I have a laptop running 5.1 and it does not show a parallel port
in CUPS either.
Any I
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 09:46 pm, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 03:43:12AM +0100,
Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
> > http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/auth.html
>
> I found that too, and I'm sure I could build it from scratch and
> make it work. My des
On Friday 21 December 2001 01:06 am, GB Clark II wrote:
> On Thursday 20 December 2001 23:31, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > > I have started proting some network protocols (ax.25
> > > for ham) from linux,...
> >
> > Hmm..I recall we had code for that but it was removed ages
> > ago (in the 2.x era)
I've looked over the mailing lists and google and I can't figure out
if the patches to the 5.0 kernel to support ACLs in Samba ever made
it into 4.4 or 4.5 Release ?
--
Jim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
he UFS2 work, and that's unlikely ever to make it
> into the RELENG_4 branch also.
>
> Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jim Durham wrote:
> > I've
#x27; after installing the 3.5 world?
Is this "Mission Impossible"? I have no one at the site that can do this.
If I say "make installworld" is the whole thing going to come to a
grinding halt?
-Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
7;t say I've seen
one lately. I think I have a Tarbell S 100 controller somewhere.
SA800 cable? A 50 pin flat ribbon with a Berg on one end and an edge
connector on the other?
-Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
aught by my 2nd line of defense,
which is the Anomy Sanitizer (Anomy needs procmail, hence my sticking
with the old Amavis version that uses procmail with sendmail.
Just make sure you have your Mlocal set up correctly in sendmail.cf and that
you have procmail configured correctly and it should w
modes". Inputting this to sysctl
results in "unknown oid 'hw.atamodes'.
The ata(4) man page is apparently wrong, so how can I change the mode
manually? I'd be happy to settle for ATA-100.
(Yes, I'm using 80 wire cables!)
Thanks,
Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 11:46 am, Jim Durham wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm using an AOPEN AK77PRO motherboard with 4.7 PRERELEASE.
>
> The ATA controller (VIA 8233) is not show on the freebsd.org web
> site as a supported chipset. Is this correct? I have reason to
>
a while in the scripts, but couldn't
figure out what was doing this?
Just for the sake of my curiosity, what was modifiying
resolv.conf? Is this a security feature?
Thanks,
--
Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
dial-up to an ISP. However, PPP only holds the
line up from 8am-8pm and this is happening at 1:59am, coinciding
with the "periodic daily" scripts from crontab.
Seemed wierd to me..
-
Jim Durham
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Andy Farkas wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Jim Durham wrote:
>
> > The 3.3 Box is a local server on a disconnected LAN talking
> > to a "remote" server that spools mail, which is grabbed by
> > fetchmail. We are running PPP on-demand to the external
> &
Bjorn Danielsson wrote:
>
> Jim Durham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 3.3 Box is a local server on a disconnected LAN talking
> > to a "remote" server that spools mail, which is grabbed by
> > fetchmail. We are running PPP on-demand to the external
>
39 matches
Mail list logo
