Re: kqueue, NOTE_EOF

2003-11-12 Thread Jaromir Dolecek
erstand what is the exact issue. Why would this be necessary or what does this exactly solve? AFAIK poll() doesn't set any flags in this case neither, so I don't see how this is inconsistent. BTW, shouldn't the EOF flag be cleared when the file is extended? Jaromir -- Jaromir Dolece

Re: kqueue, NOTE_EOF

2003-11-13 Thread Jaromir Dolecek
file on filesystem). Would poll() give you read-availability event when on end of file on filesystem. Jaromir -- Jaromir Dolecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.NetBSD.cz/ -=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the Buddhist -=- -=- masters say, ``You may notice d

fifo kqfilter change in rev. 1.54?

2002-09-23 Thread Jaromir Dolecek
keup would be done by generic code.[*] But in any case, using fi_readsock should be fine. What am I missing here? Thanks for reply, Jaromir P.S. I also believe the added so?wakeup() calls should use fi_readsock in one case and fi_writesock in the other, not fi_writesock in both cases. -