error = EBUSY;
goto fail;
}
So does anyone know whether it's safe to simply remove that test?
Thanks,
Arlie Stephens
Engineer
Dorr H. Clark
Advisor
Graduate School of Engineering
Santa Clara University,
Santa Clara, CA
;
goto invalid;
}
+#endif
*pa = ofs;
return (NBPDR - (va & PAGE4M_MASK));
}
Does anyone see any problem or have any comments about this?
Paul Lai
Engineer
Dorr H. Clark
Advisor
Graduate School of Engineering
San
mtx_unlock(&fifo_mtx);
+ /* Exclusive VOP lock is held - safe to clean */
+ fifo_cleanup(vp);
return (ENXIO);
}
fip->fi_writers++;
Test program follows.
We welcome feedback on this proposed fix.
Chitti Ni
this from being a mainstream capability?
I can't promise any useful output from my work
but I'd be happy to help with forward progress
if possible.
Thanks in advance for any useful information,
-Dorr H. Clark
Santa Clara University
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
dentifier is reported only once
trad-core.c:108: for each function it appears in.)
*** Error code 1
Stop.
< end gdb 4.16 build log excerpt >
Anyone who has any clues as to how to overcome any
of these problems, and properly access the old kernel
core files using any of the 4.16, 4.17, or 4.18 bas
code is doing
the right thing the cores are completely debuggable.
Thanks for the previous responses,
it was helpful in straightening this bug out,
-Dorr H. Clark
Santa Clara University
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
6 matches
Mail list logo