[ANN] unionfs patchset-18 release, improvements are going step by step

use unionfs, could you try p18 please? If p18 works well, please merge it to -current/-stable, rodrigc :) Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

[Request for Test] unionfs procfs/vfs_cache support tester we need

://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-procfs-sup.diff For 6-stable http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-procfs-sup.diff The unionfs lovers, would you do test that patch please? If you have no trouble, it'll be merged to common unionfs patch :) Thanks -- Daichi

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-18 release, improvements are going step by step

Ed Schouten wrote: > * Daichi GOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of the >> unionfs patchset-18. p18 is first patchset after its merged of >> FreeBSD. Our improvements works of unionfs are going step by step. >

[ANN] unionfs patchset-19-20070504 release, it is now MPSAFE and transparent mode as default

ks P.S. I am going to join BSDCan 2007. Lets meet at Ottawa, Canada :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send

Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010

up your interest around unionfs. We need to improve FreeBSD's unionfs I believe :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubs

Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010

d some comments into source-code for src-developer - edited style as style(9) saye -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, s

patchset-7 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

sh) http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese) Great thanks for Yoshihiro Ota-san :) He gave me that translated text. Please read the explanation text whom has interest in around unionfs. Thanks! Daichi GOTO wrote: I have updated the patches: For 7-current patc

Re: patchset-7 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

d some comments into source-code for src-developer - edited style as style(9) saye -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi so far so good! it's not crashing my diskless. thanks, danny It's good :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://p

Re: patchset-7 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

ng -p8 that solves your problem, Dario. Please wait -p8, I think you get good satisfaction by -p8 :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To

Re: patchset-7 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

Hi folks It is congratulations. I must say thank you for two guys. By some efforts by Yoshihiro OTA-san and Hiroo ONO-san, we could get full Egnlish-texted description site. http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ Thanks! Dario Freni wrote: Daichi GOTO wrote: At this moment, we are

patchset-8 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ (English) http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese) Please try -p8 Dario. We are thinking that you cat get it with -p8 :) Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd

patchset-8-fix1 for 6.x release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

:( -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

FreeBSD 7-current. You can use improved unionfs and nullfs together. This is a goot step for all of us. Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

FreeBSD 7-current. You can use improved unionfs and nullfs together. This is a goot step for all of us. Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hacke

Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

Jan Mikkelsen wrote: Daichi GOTO wrote: All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) OK. How about a merge? I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE. Me too, but unfortunately it is difficult with some

Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:25:33PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: >> I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs. > > Another panic, this time from umount -f: Thanks for your reports, Kris. OKay, we'll try to fix those panic problems when we have time :) --

patchset-10 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

according to style(9) source code style. I want to get active unionfs patchset users to test it. If you want stable implementation, please wait until p-11. However, of course, p-10 is stable rather than p-9 already :) Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi

Re: patchset-10 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010)

t; syscall(3b,3b,3b,bfbfe90c,0) at syscall+0x27e > Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f > --- syscall (59, FreeBSD ELF32, execve), eip = 0x280d3dfb, esp = 0xbfbfe35c, > ebp = 0xbfbfe808 --- > VOP_OPEN: 0xc72d7000 is not locked but should be > >

[ANN] unionfs patchset-11 release

know the details. Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-11 release

Kris Kennaway wrote: > I still get a panic immediately upon use: OKey. Maybe we fixed your panic. Please try attached file as /usr/src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-11 release

much :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-11 release

Munehiro Matsuda wrote: How about this? Great! I just updated site. Thanks Matsuda-san :) http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-11 release

# umount /usr/src # rm -r hoge # mkdir hoge # mount_unionfs -c transparent /usr/hoge /usr/src # cd src # find . -type f &; find . -type f &; find . -type f & What do you make of it? -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebs

[ANN] unionfs patchset-12 release

://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese) Guys taking some panic troubles with p11, please try the p12 :) We think that p12 is better stable than p11. Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers

[ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release

, please try the p13 :) We think that p13 is getting be no-panic code quality. Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release

f it. What do you make of it? -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-13 release

: sponsor him for a commit bit. He obviously has the required skills. DES It is a good idea for providing the maintenance of unionfs. Someone, please take office as my src mentor :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers

[ANN] unionfs patchset-14 release

system with the production level high quality :) Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[

[ANN] unionfs patchset-1５ relea se, it is ready for the merge

er my mentor's check. Thanks HEADS UP: to Mr. Rodrigues (rodrigc) Please check the unionfs patchset-15. After your mention, I'll do the commit work :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma

[ANN] unionfs patchset-16 release, it is ready for the merge

patchset-16 has extensive trials, good stability and source code quality enough to get the merge. I'll commit it to FreeBSD base system after writing up the manual. Thanks -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebs

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-16 release, it is ready for the merge

Daichi GOTO wrote: > Patchset-16: >For 7-current > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p16.diff > >For 6.x > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p16.diff I'm sorry, how silly of me. I updated miss edited things. I updated cor

[REQUEST] unionfs needs some guys can do implements new 2 APIs for VFS

=== Daichi GOTO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 1 Introduction We have always tried to keep changes just in unionfs segment only. But by accomplish nothing, we need change the other segment. 2 Problem Description Until now we have did many improvements for

[ANN] unionfs patchset-17 release, lock mechanism changed for robust working

cluster managers, heavy memory-fs users, or folks use unionfs), could you try p17 please? If p17 solves that panics, we guess it is unionfs merge time for current branch. Thanks P.S. Current English document of web has some Japanese contents. We need a translator ;-) -- Daichi GOTO, http

Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-17 release, lock mechanism changed for robust working

an get more feedback from testers :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"