Is anyone got running Netgear gigabit nic GA621 in 4.4?
cheers,
Igor
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I've took a brief look on Unix presentation and was wondering, why author
says that "...most Unix systems have not permitted shared memory because
the PDP-11 hardware did not encourage it..."?
Well, it wasn't so obvious deal with PDP-11 MMU, but why you have to tell to
your
students about it tod
> Once again Unix actually used this, the DEC OSes did not, so Unix was the
first to
> find the bugs in this hardware too.
I think the first sentence is not true. The RT-11 XM monitor uses the MMU
hardware
intensively even before Unix came to utilize it. I'm not talking about
RSX-11, RSTS-E and
I vote for HZ=10. What would be our test plan?
Igor.
>I'm going to benchmark different network senarious with different options
>to see what I can get, and what works best. If someone wants to help me
>out, I could maybe write up a article about it?
>> I've used a large collection of PCs r
I've made HZ=10 and ran few very simple tests (icmp, udp)
thrue gbe interface (3C985B-SX and GA620) against same system
with HZ=100. To transmit - no big difference. For recieve side
"overclocked" system bet regular in times. In my case wasn't big
difference to bing localhost and overclocked
>be open source. It's a simulated web client and web server, running
>inside the kernel. It's good for load-testing and performance-testing
>many kinds of network devices. With two 1-GHz PIII boxes (one acting
>as the client and the other acting as the server) it can generate
>around 5 (act
I cannt reproduce it. Whats the version of the NetBSD box on other side?
Does somebody IPv6 routing in your segment?
Igor.
-Original Message-
From: Edwin Groothuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPv6-over-IPv4 problems si
7 matches
Mail list logo