nner GPT device should be valid and standards compliant.
The boot loader would of course need to understand this setup but that
shouldn't be impossible.
Just a thought.
It might be too complicated compared to the non-standards compliant way
it works now which works quite well in practice
the following might work for you:
s" " s" /boot/kernel/if_iwiNG.ko" 2 load
I am no forth expert either and have just been using trial and error to
get to what I have.
--
Christian Laursen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
device driver in the tree.
I like that idea. I miss being able to wake a few of my machines the
way I could a couple of releases ago.
--
Christian Laursen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hacke
seems fine. It also occurs when numlockx is used to set numlock
> on or off without keyboard interaction.
For me the issue went away when I removed atkbd support from my
kernel. I still have ukbd and kbdmux.
--
Christian Laursen
___
freebsd-h
OK update
Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
--
Christian Laursen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ha
lly going to use it.
Otherwise I would have to unload it after boot in the normal case which
is far from elegant.
--
Christian Laursen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having a process (or full system) checkpoint facility would make the
> implementation of suspend-to-disk rather trivial --- which is a much
> desired feature.
I would definitely use such a feature if it was added to FreeBSD.
--
Ch
the kernel would check that partition and
if it found a dump there restore it to the machine's memory,
reinitialize devices and continue where it left off.
Any thoughts? Could this be done or would an entirely different
approach be better?
--
Ch
Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian Laursen wrote:
> > I was thinking about software suspend and got this crazy idea.
> > I have no idea if this is possible or total madness but here
> > goes anyway.
> > The idea would be to force the system to
reconfigured to run in
degraded mode and sync is not possible. In my book that's not good
enough for production.
Furthermore it would be nice with a mirror implementation that
automatically syncs the mirror after an unclean shutdown.
--
Best regards
Christian Laursen
__
10 matches
Mail list logo