> If this is the board I think it is, it's a Supermicro P6DLE dual Slot-1
> motherboard with an integrated Intel 82559 (no external PHY).
>
> (I had this board for some time before I gave it to David, it was
> originally donated to FTL by Bob Willcox.)
>
> &
a FreeBSD 4.0-stable system:
FreeBSD sebulba.vieo.com 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #202: Mon May 7 15:09:46 CDT
2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/GPXTEST i386
Anybody have any ideas what I need to do to get this to work?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Living yo
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:52:47PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:20:05PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > root@sebulba:p0 /root> ftp 192.168.1.2
> > ftp: socket: No buffer space available
>
> One possibility is that your process limits for sbsize
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > >
> > > I am working on a FreeBSD device driver for my Co's GSN adap
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:17:53PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 17:15:20 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > >
tem is 4.2-stable as of about Jan 10th
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Egotist, n.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] A person of low taste, more interested in himself than me.
Austin, TX-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am working on a device driver for a GSN adapter that has hardware CRC
checking and need to know if there is a way to disable the software CRC
checking for TCP? This is on a FreeBSD 4.2-stable system.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Egotist, n.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] A person of low
way, but would like to find some way in my driver to
turn off the checksums if possible.
Thanks,
Bob
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:41:14PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am working on a device driv
Thanks Drew! This helps alot!
Bob
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 05:00:43PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>
> Jesper Skriver writes:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:41:14PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am working on a device driv
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 04:52:00AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:52:12PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> |
> | and may prevent the upper layers from checking the CRC on input.
>
> There are good reasons why checksumming in upper layers should not be dis
rt this so that when I rlogin as root to these boxes the
kernel printf's don't get written to my rlogin session?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Egotist, n.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] A person of low taste, more interested in himself than me.
Austin, TX-- Ambrose Bierce
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:34:31PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Brian Reichert wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:59:34PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > > I have just upgraded my debug/test systems here to 4.3-stable and I'm
> > >
OTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ... if the church put in half th
=38400" in the /boot/loader.rc file to no avail.
No doubt I am missing something.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Man usually avoids attributing cleverness to somebody else --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]unless it is an enemy.
Austin, TX
Oops, I forgot to add that this is on a 4.0-stable system (from about 3
months ago).
Thanks again,
Bob
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 08:52:25AM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have tried everything I could think of to raise the speed of my
> system's serial console
nks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox hatred, n:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] A sentiment appropriate to the occasion of
Austin, TXanother's superiority.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To follow-up my own question, it appears that the STAILQ_LAST macro has
been changed (fixed) in -current to return the address of the last entry
(or NULL if the list is empty).
Bob
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 04:32:03PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> I am using a SINGLY-LINKED TAIL QUEUE in a dev
ive me any
pointers to where?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86
[EMAIL PROTECTED] architecture that allows you to install Windows.
Austin, TX -- Matthew D. Fuller
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
sl (http://www.xosl.org), which has a lot of
> addtional features over both os-bs and booteasy, including an optional
> partition manager. It is also being maintained currently, unlike
> both Booteasy and OS-BS.
>
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > * Bob Willcox <
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 03:03:18PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:06:53PM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > Well, ob-bs didn't work either. I went to the referenced site for
>
> The 1.35 version doesn't for me either. Can you the the "
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:53:42PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Bob Willcox wrote:
> >
> > Well, ob-bs didn't work either. I went to the referenced site for
> > XOSL and it certainly looked interesting...but was way more than I was
> > looking for at this ti
ow what to try.
Has anyone used one of these things for serial console access? Any
suggestions, help or tips would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Acquaintance, n.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]A person whom we know well enough to borrow from,
Austin, TX
Hi All,
I need to build a statically-linked version of cvs so that I can run
it in a jail. I was hoping someone out there could describe the steps
necessary to build cvs static on 4.4-stable.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Boucher's Observation:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] H
.
Oh, well, thanks anyway as your reply got me on the track.
Bob
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:16:46PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Nov 13), Bob Willcox said:
> > I need to build a statically-linked version of cvs so that I can run
> > it in a jail. I was hoping som
re at their defaults, including an MTU of
1500...though simply raising that didn't seem to help).
Thanks for any help/advice,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Putt's Law:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Technology is dominated by two types of people:
Austin, TXThose
circumstances that prevent getblk() from returning NULL in actual
operation?
Thanks for any insight that you may provide.
Bob
--
Bob Willcox Maslow's Maxim:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If the only tool you have is a hammer,
Austin, TX you treat every
hardware). This resulted in a rather unportable code base.
Additionally, since it was derived from AT&T (and BSD) filesystem
code, there were some licensing issues. As I recall, these two issues
(portability and license) were what lead to the reimplementation for
OS/2 (I wasn't in
to further debug this. Any/all suggestions will be gratefully received.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is a delight to moralists. That is why they
Austin, TX invented hell. -- Bertra
28 matches
Mail list logo
