Re: USB ethernet hacking

> (one for RX, one for TX). For TX, I would set up a transfer and initiate > > it, then wait until the callback is called to free the mbuf containing > > the packet data. > > We just copied the data from the mbuf into a dedicated > buffer and freed the mbuff immediatly. Did

Re: USB ethernet hacking

e fixed that problem for now, however I'm still not sure why I can't seem to transfer full 1500 byte frames without getting an I/O error. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(212) 854-6020 | System Manager

Possible solution for USB Ethernet problem

e this sort of thing correctly? -Bill -- ===== -Bill Paul(212) 854-6020 | System Manager, Master of Unix-Fu Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Center for Telecommunications Research Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Columbia

Re: Possible solution for USB Ethernet problem

USB support compiled in doesn't work: the machine panics immediately after printing the "uhci0: " line above. I bet a quarter it's trying to do yet another tsleep() when it's not really able to. -Bill -- =

Re: Porting ether-wake.c from Linux

r than the host's actual station address), then you need to use the magic pseudo_AF_HDRCMPLT flag. (Uhm... though I don't remember how.) It's not clear if you need this or not (I don't think you do), but if you do, now you know. -Bill -- ===

Looking for testers with LinkSys USB100TX

traffic. NOTE: do _NOT_ delay. Don't tell me "Sure, I have one; I'll try it in a month and get back to you." This should only take a few minutes. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(212) 854-6020 | Sys

Re: ypldap-0.8

: invalid compressed data--format violated Try again, and this time test it to make sure you did it right. -Bill -- ===== -Bill Paul(212) 854-6020 | System Manager, Master of Unix-Fu Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

pport > zero copy TCP receive. > > The Alteon boards, on the other hand, have most of the features necessary, > and if I get some time, I may add the last feature (header splitting) to > the firmware. > > The other alternative is SysKonnect, and that might actually be a goo

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

f the XMACs and performance on that port would get spotty. I think the total TX FIFO memory on the XMAC II is 2K. -Bill -- = -Bill Paul(212) 854-6020 | System Manager, Master of Unix-Fu Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Center for Telecommunications Research Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

t you can modify the > firmware, and so header splitting is an option there. It would even be > possible to split the headers off of IPv6 packets, or any other protocol > that you have knowlege of. If you can actually modify the firmware to do this then you have a lot more guru

<    1   2