Hello hackers@
I'm working on getting FreeBSD working with the ARM EABI. As part of
this the Procedure Call Standard for the ARM Architecture (AAPCS)
defines wchar_t as an unsigned int.
Looking at sys/sys/_types.h rune_t, wchar_t and wint_t are of type
__ct_rune_t which is an int. Furthermore as
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:07:30 +0200
Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:36:57AM +1300, Andrew Turner wrote:
> > Along with this WCHAR_MIN and WCHAR_MAX are defined both in
> > and . I would like to remove the copy
> > from wchar.h and add an include
On Mon, 7 May 2012 22:32:10 -0700
Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2012, at 6:57 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, May 05, 2012 1:06:13 am Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >> I have ubldr loading the ELF kernel on BeagleBone and am now
> >> trying to untangle some of the hacks I used to get this
I've been working on getting the ARM EABI working with FreeBSD.
As part of the EABI spec the Procedure Call Standard for the ARM
Architecture (AAPCS) defines wchar_t as either an unsigned int or an
unsigned short with the former as the preferred type. FreeBSD defines
wchar_t as a __wchar_t, which
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:06:07 +0200
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2013-06-27 02:02, Kevin Day wrote:
> > Are you supposed to be able to use gcc to build userland binaries
> > if you built world with clang?
> >
> > I'm on -CURRENT as of a few days ago (using armv6 but i'm not sure
> > if that matters)
gt; operation.
I ran a quick test on installing and removing a single package with
both the cvs and my own version of pkg_delete. I got a small but
significant speed improvement with my implementation. The difference
was too small to be noticeable by a human
use libpkg in the base would require the rest of the pkg
tools to be implemented and a lot of testing. As I haven't implemented
all the base pkg tools and testing has just been with a limited number
of packages I wouldn't want to be responsible for the breakage using
libpk
7 matches
Mail list logo