>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Mohler
>
>On Nov 24, 2007 2:08 PM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joel V. wrote:
>> > Hello.
>> >
>> > A big thanks to everyone who contacted me. FreeBSD really
>has the best
>> > community one could help for.
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
>
>Ilya Bakulin writes:
>> May you suggest any other tests?
>
>What other tests? The disks suck, how are more tests going to improve
>the situation?
>
>> Or let's live with sucking WD Green and look for other 4096K-sector
>> models from other manufacturers?
>
>I see no
>-Original Message-
>From: owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>hack...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Xin LI
>Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 4:35 AM
>To: Daniel O'Connor
>Cc: jruoho...@iki.fi; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; krad
>Subject: Re: Distributed SSH attack
>
>-BE
>From: owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org
>[mailto:owner-freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Outback Dingo
>
>my curiousity is howd he get duplicate mac addresses
>
The most common cause that I've seen is duplicating virtual machines and not
telling VMWare (or whatever you use) to re-jigger
Torbjorn Kristoffersen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:19:33PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:40:16PM +0100, Torbjorn Kristoffersen scribbled:
> > > | Hi I'm using 4.2-RELEASE, with a parallel port ZIP drive (1
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Jason Andresen wrote:
> >
> > If only FreeBSD could boot from those funky M-Systems flash disks.
>
> It can.
How? Nothing I found in the documentation indicated this, or gave any
sort hint as to how I might go about doing it. The Linux driver has
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Jason Andresen wrote:
> >
> > Results:
> > ufs+softupdates is a little slower than ext2fs+wc for low numbers of
> > files, but scales better. I wish I had a Reiserfs partition to
> > test with.
>
> Ext2fs is a non-contender.
>
> Note, though, that t
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:31:34AM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
>
> > We only have three Linux boxes here (and one is a PC104 with a flash
> > disk) and already I've had to reinstall the entire OS once when we had a
> > power glitch. ext2fsck managed
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 02:49:21PM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
>
> > 6 files took ~15 minutes to create as is. I'm going to have to wait
> > until tonight to run larger sets. 2.2.16 is what we have here.
> > I'm still waiting to see how much fa
I just finished the FreeBSD test with
vfs.vmiodirenable=1 (it was 0 before)
6 simlultanious files, 1 transactions, FreeBSD
4.0-Release+Softupdates with write cacheing disabled. Results are pretty
much unchanged. Do you have to enable vmiodirenable at boot time for it
to take affect?
T
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I don't understand the inability to perform the trivial
> design engineering necessary to keep from needing to put
> 60,000 files in one directory.
>
> However, we can take it as a given that people who need
> to do this are incapable of doing computer
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:03:33PM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
>
> > The data:
> >
> > Hardware:
> > Both machines have the same hardware on paper (although it is TWO
> > machines,
> > YMMV).
> > PII-300
> > Intel PIIX4 ATA33 controller
> > IBM-DHEA-
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> Where I live, the power gets worse every year. I lost quite a few ext
> filesystems, but only a couple of ufs and ext2 filesystems. Then I
> bought a 1920VA UPS and it's no longer an issue. I just found it easier
> to not lose power than to worry abou
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:17:12AM -0400, Andresen,Jason R. wrote:
>
> > > Did you enable write caching? You didn't mention, and it's off by
> > > default in 4.3, but I think enabled by default on Linux.
> >
&g
On Wed, 23 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Tell them to fire 20K packets/second at the linux box and watch it crumble.
> Linux has lots of little kludges to make it appear faster on some benchmarks,
> but from a networking standpoint it cant handle significant network loads.
>
Are you sure
On Thu, 24 May 2001, void wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:20:51AM -0400, Andresen,Jason R. wrote:
> >
> > Why is knowing the file names cheating? It is almost certain
> > that the application will know the names of it's own files
> > (and won't be greppi
Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> Used ABBR on SCSI disks all the time, very nice.
>
> Remember reading on hackers somewhere that newer drives like IBM supported
> this feature. I'm getting a few bad blocks on a 75GB IBM drive (at least
> according to the ata driver), and rather than replacing it and mo
Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > > I wrote a little line program to do a revoke(), it was basically
> > >
> > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { revoke(argv[1]); }
> > >
> > > Now this doesn't kill a darn thing. And you should be aware of it! But it
> > > does forcibly "close" any open fd's pointing
You might also try xosl (http://www.xosl.org), which has a lot of
addtional features over both os-bs and booteasy, including an optional
partition manager. It is also being maintained currently, unlike
both Booteasy and OS-BS.
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> * Bob Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01
Bob Willcox wrote:
>
> Well, ob-bs didn't work either. I went to the referenced site for
> XOSL and it certainly looked interesting...but was way more than I was
> looking for at this time (I was happy with the default FreeBSD installed
> boot manager before W98 trashed it and I certainly didn
20 matches
Mail list logo
