Hi,
I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it is
not available.
Are there anybody have got an experience about this?
[url]http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1448/gkkih.html#scrolltoc[/url]
[url]http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/servers-stor
Le 03/09/2013 14:14, Emre Çamalan a écrit :
> Hi,
> I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it
> is not available.
"That would require ZFS v30. As far as I am aware Oracle has not
released the code under CDDL."
From http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=30
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
> see developing in project/camlock SVN branch. Full diff of that branch
> aga
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Florent Peterschmitt
wrote:
> Le 03/09/2013 14:14, Emre Çamalan a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it
>> is not available.
>
> "That would require ZFS v30. As far as I am aware Oracle has not
> released the
Le 03/09/2013 16:53, Alan Somers a écrit :
> GELI is full-disk encryption. It's far superior to ZFS encryption.
Yup, but is there a possibility to encrypt a ZFS volume (not a whole
pool) with a separate GELI partition?
Also, in-ZFS encryption would be a nice thing if it could work like an
LVM/LU
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Florent Peterschmitt
wrote:
> Le 03/09/2013 16:53, Alan Somers a écrit :
>> GELI is full-disk encryption. It's far superior to ZFS encryption.
>
> Yup, but is there a possibility to encrypt a ZFS volume (not a whole
> pool) with a separate GELI partition?
You mean
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> > improving CAM and GEOM scalability, that for last six months you could
> > see developi
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 12:40:15 pm Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 28 August 2013 18:12, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
> > So, if I understand this correctly, a normal desktop user won't
> > notice any real change, except that buildworld might get faster,
> > and big servers will benefit?
>
> Basically,
On Friday, August 23, 2013 9:23:51 am Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am using FreeBSD-9-STABLE on the following hardware:
>
> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 24 CPUs
> FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 6 core(s) x 2 SMT threads
>
> So I have 2 physical CPUs with 6 core each.
>
>
Does anyone know if work on booting FreeBSD on modern Apple hardware
was ever completed? I have looked on the wiki, forums, and email archives
but I don't see anything definitive.
I would like to have a GPT partitioned disk with a freebsd-boot, freebsd-swap,
and multiple freebsd-ufs partitions on
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I would like to invite more people to review and test my patches for
> > > improving
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
> theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
> help further it.
> Just checking to see how widely its been tested,
I've installed this patch
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Outback Dingo
> wrote:
> > Can anyone confirm how well tested/stable this patch set might be?? if
> > theres positive input i have a zoo of dev machines i could load it on, to
> > help further it.
> > J
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:24:26PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:49:33AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > I would
14 matches
Mail list logo