Re: priv_check/make_dev/devfs.rules: What is preventing a device to show up in a jail?

On 2013-06-13, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Can we introduce a new syntax while keeping the old behaviour? > > path zvol/* hide-r > path zvol/* unhide-r > > I think this will be more accepted than changing existing behaviour! IMHO, the old behavior is so confusing and unintuitive that we should

panic: vfs_mount_destroy: nonzero activevnodelistsize

http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=223457 ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"