Port GlusterFS as a GSoC 2013 project

2013-04-26 Thread Mike Ma
Hi there, I'm now a student and trying to get involved in GSoC this year. I found the proposal of about GlusterFS in the idea list wiki page very interesting to me, possibly it will be porting from NetBSD implementation. As I'm quite distant from idea owner so there's a big time difference, he als

Port GlusterFS as a GSoC project

2013-04-26 Thread Mike Ma
Hi there, I'm now a student and trying to get involved in GSoC this year. I found the proposal of about GlusterFS in the idea list wiki page very interesting to me, possibly it will be porting from NetBSD implementation. As I'm quite distant from idea owner, he also suggested me to try to find som

Re: Some improvements to rm(1)

2013-04-26 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:56:10PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 25 April 2013 22:50, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:16:32PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> Anyone have thoughts on the following? > >> commit 82c78ba923d8ce4a1bfbb309658c49021c8bb384 > >> Author: Eitan Adler >

Re: Some improvements to rm(1)

2013-04-26 Thread Eitan Adler
On 26 April 2013 08:22, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:56:10PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 25 April 2013 22:50, Brooks Davis wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:16:32PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >> Anyone have thoughts on the following? > >> >> commit 82c78ba923d8ce

Re: Some improvements to rm(1)

2013-04-26 Thread Joshua Isom
On 4/26/2013 7:23 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: Yes, rm's functionality can be fully replicated by find. As well as anything using -R. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, se

Re: Some improvements to rm(1)

2013-04-26 Thread Dan Rue
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > I think the -x option seems a bit odd. What is the use case? At a > first thought, it seems to raise more questions than it resolves. > I was cleaning up a system a year ago and I had an "rm -rf" traverse into a production NFS mountpoint..

Re: Some improvements to rm(1)

2013-04-26 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:33:54AM -0500, Joshua Isom wrote: > On 4/26/2013 7:23 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > > Yes, rm's functionality can be fully replicated by find. > As well as anything using -R. Emulating other -R things using find becomes quite slow when you don't want to impose {PATH_MAX} lim

makeman issues

2013-04-26 Thread Eitan Adler
I'm trying to regenerate src.conf.5 after my recent WITH*_IDEA removal but the diff shows: Does anyone know why WITHOUT_BIND_UTILS is showing up a bazillion times? diff --git a/share/man/man5/src.conf.5 b/share/man/man5/src.conf.5 index 17afca2..54b63db 100644 --- a/share/man/man5/src.conf.5 +++

Re: makeman issues

2013-04-26 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:05:50PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > I'm trying to regenerate src.conf.5 after my recent WITH*_IDEA removal > but the diff shows: > > Does anyone know why WITHOUT_BIND_UTILS is showing up a bazillion times? > Looks like DES already spotted this too. ---