On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> So, this is not a valid warning in our universe and I'd like to silence
> it when compiling sys/boot as printf(9) and sprintf(9) supports this
> format. How can we silence this warning for the FreeBSD universe?
>
> ===> efi/libefi (all)
> In fil
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:58:30PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:41:38PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > I'd like feedback on the attached patch, which adds support to our
> > > time_pps_fetch() imp
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 17:58 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:41:38PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > I'd like feedback on the attached patch, which adds support to our
> > > time_pps_fetch() implementation
On 2013-02-10 01:10, Sean Bruno wrote:> So, this is not a valid warning in our
universe and I'd like to silence
it when compiling sys/boot as printf(9) and sprintf(9) supports this
format. How can we silence this warning for the FreeBSD universe?
===> efi/libefi (all)
In file included from efi
Hello there,
Let me call your attention to the approaching deadline of the next
set(s) of FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports. Please consider
submitting a few lines on your FreeBSD-related project, we are
counting on all of you! :-)
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Gabor Pali wrote:
>Please
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:58:09PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote:
> I discovered today that fcntl(fd, F_READAHEAD, 0) doesn't work as
> advertised. It's supposed to disable readahead, but instead it restores
> the default readahead behavior (if it had previously been changed), and
> there is no way to d
6 matches
Mail list logo