Re: Eliminating a warning in sys/boot

2013-02-10 Thread hiren panchasara
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > So, this is not a valid warning in our universe and I'd like to silence > it when compiling sys/boot as printf(9) and sprintf(9) supports this > format. How can we silence this warning for the FreeBSD universe? > > ===> efi/libefi (all) > In fil

Re: Request for review, time_pps_fetch() enhancement

2013-02-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:47:06PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 05:58:30PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:41:38PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > I'd like feedback on the attached patch, which adds support to our > > > time_pps_fetch() imp

Re: Request for review, time_pps_fetch() enhancement

2013-02-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 17:58 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:41:38PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > I'd like feedback on the attached patch, which adds support to our > > > time_pps_fetch() implementation

Re: Eliminating a warning in sys/boot

2013-02-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-02-10 01:10, Sean Bruno wrote:> So, this is not a valid warning in our universe and I'd like to silence it when compiling sys/boot as printf(9) and sprintf(9) supports this format. How can we silence this warning for the FreeBSD universe? ===> efi/libefi (all) In file included from efi

Reminder: FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports, July--December, 2012

2013-02-10 Thread Gabor Pali
Hello there, Let me call your attention to the approaching deadline of the next set(s) of FreeBSD Quarterly Status Reports. Please consider submitting a few lines on your FreeBSD-related project, we are counting on all of you! :-) On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Gabor Pali wrote: >Please

Re: fcntl(2) F_READAHEAD set to zero doesn't work [patch]

2013-02-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:58:09PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > I discovered today that fcntl(fd, F_READAHEAD, 0) doesn't work as > advertised. It's supposed to disable readahead, but instead it restores > the default readahead behavior (if it had previously been changed), and > there is no way to d