On 5 December 2012 07:02, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 4 December 2012 21:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Eitan Adler
> Date: Tue, 4 De
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 4 December 2012 21:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Reference:
From: Eitan Adler
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:58:20 -0500
Message-id:
>>>
>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 16/11/2012 16:42 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 15/11/2012 23:44 Attilio Rao said the following:
>>> Do you think you can test this patch?:
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/lockmgr_forcerec.patch
>>
>> I will use this patch in m
Hello,
I'm writing a storage controller driver for 9.0-RELEASE-p4 and i'm using
sleepq at initialization to sleep until command is processed by controller:
struct command {
<...>
uint8_tdone;
};
void send_command_and_wait(struct command *cmd)
{
command->done = 0;
send_comman
on 05/12/2012 17:55 Alexandr Matveev said the following:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing a storage controller driver for 9.0-RELEASE-p4 and i'm using
> sleepq at initialization to sleep until command is processed by controller:
>
> struct command {
> <...>
> uint8_tdone;
> };
>
> void send_
On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:41:32 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in parallel. Some
> > of
> > the make jobs may not be as obvious since links are silent (no output
> > unless
> > there
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:41:32 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in parallel. Some
>> > of
>> > the make jobs may not be as obvi
On Dec 5, 2012, at 9:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:41:32 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in parallel. Some
>>> of
>>> the make jobs may not be as obvious s
On 5 Dec 2012, at 18:39, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 9:42 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:41:32 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>
Hmm, I certainly see the module directories being built in paralle
All. KASSERT() is a really need way of expressing invariants when
INVARIANTS is defined. However for regular, non-INVARIANTS code folks
have the typical if() panic() combos, or private macros. Would a
KVERIFY() that does this in non-INVARIANTS code make sense?
-vijay
__
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
...
> All trolling aside, I believe an awesome fix to be setting module override in
> /etc/make.conf to only build the 4-5 specific modules one needs.
>
> To be honest I think this configuration tweak should be advertised a bit more
> as i
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Kurt Lidl wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:06:56AM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> > Hello hackers,
> >
> > The following PR patches crunchide(1) to accept object files produced by
> the gold and mclinker linkers:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bi
12 matches
Mail list logo
