old style kernel configuration

2012-11-21 Thread Eitan Adler
I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents. While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually. Is there any value in keeping this documented as an alternative to "make buildkernel" or

Re: old style kernel configuration

2012-11-21 Thread Devin Teske
On Nov 21, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents. > While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the > "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually. > I always build kernels with c

Re: old style kernel configuration

2012-11-21 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 11/21/2012 8:21 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents. >> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the >> "old style" kernel configuration involving running co

Re: old style kernel configuration

2012-11-21 Thread Julian Elischer
On 11/21/12 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents. While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the "old style" kernel configuration involving running config(1) manually. Is there any value in keeping this documented

Re: old style kernel configuration

2012-11-21 Thread Eitan Adler
On 21 November 2012 23:52, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 11/21/12 5:58 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> >> I've been working on removing obsolete information various documents. >> While going through older articles I noticed a few references to the >> "old style" kernel configuration involving running conf