Re: How to boot FreeBSD and linux from FreeBSD MBR?

2012-10-28 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 28.10.2012 01:46 (UTC+2), Yuri wrote: > On 10/27/2012 02:42, matt wrote: >> This means you have grub2. It is slow as molasses and has to be the mbr. >> You could chainload freebsd's partition under a separate entry, like >> Windows The partition bootcode for FreeBSD will boot it from there. You

Re: Porting patch(1) from NetBSD to FreeBSD (was Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!)

2012-10-28 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 27-10-2012 23:17, hiren panchasara escreveu: > Hi Pedro / List, > > I am not part of google summer of code but I've tried to port patch(1) from > NetBSD into FreeBSD head. I hope that is okay. > > Patching was trivial and It _seems_ to be working fine. > > I would appreciate any ideas around

Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 27 October 2012 22:10, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:53:56 +0100, Chris Rees writes: >>I'm saying that it's unacceptable to expect people to change their >>systems just to make the ports tree work after we have broken it on a >>supposedly supported version. > > But there's

Re: How to boot FreeBSD and linux from FreeBSD MBR?

2012-10-28 Thread Frank Mitchell
Hi Yuri, I've been through this too. The short answer is to install LILO everywhere, once for each time you install a version of Linux. I discovered this from System Rescue CD, which is an obvious piece of kit for this situation. Currently I have the FreeBSD Boot Selector in my MBR, installed f

Re: Porting patch(1) from NetBSD to FreeBSD (was Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!)

2012-10-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 28 October 2012 03:55, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Hi Hiren, > > good to hear that someone is working on this! However, porting these > utilies is much tougher than it apparently seems. There are much more > criteria than just it compiles and works. More specifically, you should > make sure that:

Re: VIMAGE crashes on 9.x with hotplug net80211 devices

2012-10-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
ping? Marko - would you be willing to add the if_free() vnet context setup into -HEAD? Hans, what do you think about USB device attach? detach will be covered by the above (I hope!) but we still need to do a CURVNET_SET(vnet0); during hotplug attach. Thanks, Adrian On 23 October 2012 10:37,

Re: Porting patch(1) from NetBSD to FreeBSD (was Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!)

2012-10-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 28 October 2012 03:55, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >> Hi Hiren, >> >> good to hear that someone is working on this! However, porting these >> utilies is much tougher than it apparently seems. There are much more >> criteria than just it compil

Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-28 Thread Chris Rees
On 28 October 2012 19:11, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:06:41 +, Chris Rees writes: >>Are we planning to replace /usr/bin/make with bmake in the near future? > > That was what I heard, but any such move is dependent on dealing with > ports. The ~sjg/ports2bmake.tar.gz on

Re: VIMAGE crashes on 9.x with hotplug net80211 devices

2012-10-28 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, I currently have not tested VIMAGE with USB devices. Detach is the final exit for a USB device. There is also shutdown, but softc still is around. --HPS On Sunday 28 October 2012 19:47:20 Adrian Chadd wrote: > ping? > > Marko - would you be willing to add the if_free() vnet context setup

opensolaris B_TRUE and B_FALSE

2012-10-28 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Hello, I'm looking at this Clang analyzer report: http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/WORLD/2012-10-24-amd64/report-uH6BjZ.html.gz#EndPath Apart from the actual error, which is a apse positive, it seems like Clang can't find the macro definitions for B_TRUE and B_FALSE (if it did, hoverin

Re: opensolaris B_TRUE and B_FALSE

2012-10-28 Thread Ian Lepore
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 00:02 +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking at this Clang analyzer report: > http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/WORLD/2012-10-24-amd64/report-uH6BjZ.html.gz#EndPath > Apart from the actual error, which is a apse positive, it seems like Clang > can'

Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-10-28 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:06:41 +, Chris Rees writes: >Are we planning to replace /usr/bin/make with bmake in the near future? That was what I heard, but any such move is dependent on dealing with ports. The ~sjg/ports2bmake.tar.gz on freefall is the plan I came up with after the above "require

'device atapicam' breaks the build

2012-10-28 Thread Yuri
Following atapicam(4), I added 'device atapicam' into sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC. This causes 'make buildkernel' to fail: ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o zlib.ko.debug zlib.o :> export_syms awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.debug export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.ko.debug objcopy -

Re: 'device atapicam' breaks the build

2012-10-28 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:42:44 -0700 Yuri wrote: > Following atapicam(4), I added 'device atapicam' into > sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC. This causes 'make buildkernel' to fail: > > ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o zlib.ko.debug zlib.o > :> export_syms > awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.d