Re: gpart is junk

2012-09-28 Thread Wojciech Puchar
but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel. I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed, XML is stupid. everything you can do with XML can be better described using "ancient" style text format ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.or

Re: gpart is junk

2012-09-28 Thread Mike Meyer
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:19:12 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel. > > I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed, > XML is stupid. everything you can do with XML can be better described > using "ancient" style text format

Re: gpart is junk

2012-09-28 Thread Daode
Wojciech Puchar wrote: |>> but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel. |>> |> |> I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed, |XML is stupid. everything you can do with XML can be better described |using "ancient" style text format Or, if all fails, YAML-is-JSON,