i am looking for SMALL and specifically low power board that can run from
battery, can run FreeBSD and have at least one ethernet and one USB port,
and reasonable amount of memory (32MB at least).
WiFi not needed. some more than few MB flash is, as well as about 10 GPIO
ports or useful SPI port.
if you can still find one a Ubiquiti RouterStation / RouterStation Pro
works wonders and has full FreeBSD support
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> i am looking for SMALL and specifically low power board that can run from
> battery, can run FreeBSD and have at least one et
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
> i am looking for SMALL and specifically low power board that can run
> from battery, can run FreeBSD and have at least one ethernet and one
> USB port, and reasonable amount of memory (32MB at least). WiFi not
> needed. some more than few M
Soekris Engineering makes excellent boards. While they are based
in the states, they do have a reseller in Europe.
How much power does it use and at what voltage? the lower the better
I use a bunch at work for various tasks. Very reliable hardware.
They use various i386 compatible
thanks for answer.
TP-Link TL-WR1043ND seems to be best choice for me.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 05/07/2012 10:48, Olivier Smedts wrote:
And it really annoys me too because usually, instead of an immediate
"command not found", you've got a reply seconds later if on a not so
fast computer. When working on Ubuntu, after a typo or missing command
I have the time to realize that something str
On 5 August 2012 10:07, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> thanks for answer.
> TP-Link TL-WR1043ND seems to be best choice for me.
I'm not sure how much power the thing draws when operational. It'd be
nice if someone started taking responsibility for power save support
on the SoCs. I'm happy to eventuall
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:53:03PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:24:08PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> > People sometimes use system() from large address spaces where it would
> > improve performance greatly to use vfork() instead of fork().
> > A simple approach
> I suggest the starting point is a webpage with a link to the slides
> being presented and a simple audio stream.
two way, please. i am amazed that ietf had two-way back when it was the
mbone. with multicast actually deployed, now it is one-way.
randy
__
On 08/02/2012 12:18, David Chisnall wrote:
> Thank you for your thoughtful reply,
You too ... I let some time go by to see what others had to say. I think
it's disappointing that more people aren't concerned about this issue.
> On 2 Aug 2012, at 19:33, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> However, my point i
10 matches
Mail list logo
