One of my 9.1-BETA1 systems periodically freezes. If sound was playing, it
would usually cycle with a very short period.
so interrupts are off.
And system stops being
sensitive to keyboard/mouse. Also ping of this system doesn't get a response.
I would normally think that this is the faulty me
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
> You don't want to work cooperatively.
>
Why is it that mbuf's refactoring consultation is being held in
internal, private, committers-and-invite-only-restricted meeting at
BSDCan ?
Why is it that so much review and discussion on changes
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> You don't want to work cooperatively.
>>
> Why is it that mbuf's refactoring consultation is being held in
> internal, private, committers-and-invite-only-restricted meeting a
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> You don't want to work cooperatively.
>>>
>> Why is it that mbuf's refactoring consultation is being held in
>
On 8/1/12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao
>>> wrote:
You don't want to work cooperatively.
>>> Why is it t
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Yuri wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 17:50, Mark Saad wrote:
>>
>> Yuri
>>Install sysutils/mcelog and try running the example included . While
>> not a complete definitative hardware test it can report other hardware
>> issues that memtest86+ misses and it can be run o
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Yuri wrote:
> One of my 9.1-BETA1 systems periodically freezes. If sound was playing, it
> would usually cycle with a very short period. And system stops being
> sensitive to keyboard/mouse. Also ping of this system doesn't get a
> response.
> I would normally thin
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 8/1/12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao
wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:45:35 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe
One obvious problem in FreeBSD is that committers are prosecutor,
judge and jury altogether.
As a user, I accept this.
I think if you can make a meaningful
contribution to FreeBSD developments
in the desig
Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
added to the developer summits. Plenty of the people at the most
recent developer summit weren't @freebsd.org committers - we had
plenty of representation from companies using FreeBSD.
If you want to participate, just ask a frien
On 8/1/12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
[ trimm ]
>> You are forgetting one specific detail: you can always review a work
>> *after* it entered the tree. This is something you would never do, but
>> sometimes, when poor quality code is commi
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Arnaud Lacombe
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Attilio Rao
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You don't want to work cooperativ
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
> added to the developer summits. Plenty of the people at the most
> recent developer summit weren't @freebsd.org committers - we had
> plenty of representation from comp
On 8/1/12 12:45 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
As for the mbuf meeting, all I can find from it online is:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2012-June/012629.html
actually nothing has happenned on this yet that I know of, which i
On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
>> added to the developer summits. Plenty of the people at the most
>> recent developer summit weren't @freebsd
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
>> added to the developer summits. Plenty of the people at the most
>> recent developer summit weren't @freeb
Hello,
What is the best way to enumerate the sleeping threads via
sleepqueue(9)? Furthermore, when enumerating the threads that are on
the run queue, what locks are needed, if any?
Thank you.
--
Daniel Rudy
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing lis
On 2012/8/2 10:12, Daniel Rudy wrote:
Hello,
What is the best way to enumerate the sleeping threads via
sleepqueue(9)? Furthermore, when enumerating the threads that are on
the run queue, what locks are needed, if any?
sleepqueue hash bucket is private data structure in subr_sleepqueue.c, I
th
--- On Wed, 8/1/12, David Xu wrote:
From: David Xu
Subject: Re: Enumerating sleeping threads
To: "Daniel Rudy"
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2012, 7:25 PM
On 2012/8/2 10:12, Daniel Rudy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the best way to enumerate the sleeping threads via
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> Any interested party is very welcome to approach a developer and get
>>> added to the developer summits. Plenty of t
On Aug 1, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Any interested party is very welcome to approach
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:36:26PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> I think this proves the point everybody has been saying: you
> are being needlessly contrary and confrontational.
>
Yep. In 18+ years of being subscribed to various freebsd
lists, Arnaud has the honor of being only the 2nd person
On 8/1/2012 8:36 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> I think this proves the point everybody has been saying: you are being
> needlessly contrary and confrontational.
Actually if you take a step back and look at what Arnaud is saying
objectively, he's right. If anyone can attend the meeting by simply
gettin
Yep. In 18+ years of being subscribed to various freebsd
lists, Arnaud has the honor of being only the 2nd person
to earn a killfile entry. He's now sitting next to Jesus
Monroy, Jr.
it is not a proud from you to talk about who you are blocking.
_
24 matches
Mail list logo
