On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:29:59 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> For the OP, make sure you have the latest BIOS. I had a similar problem
> with vt-x and it was solved by a later BIOS upgrade.
And *that* solved the problem. The performance is much better, now
being a lot like using a poor wireless mouse.
On 07/15/2012 02:39, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:29:59 -0700
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> For the OP, make sure you have the latest BIOS. I had a similar problem
>> with vt-x and it was solved by a later BIOS upgrade.
>
> And *that* solved the problem. The performance is much better,
being a lot like using a poor wireless mouse.
My thanks to everyone who took time to help me.
by the way anyone know WHY BIOS is over control of that CPU feature?
It is quite scary to know that my FreeBSD system isn't really under
FreeBSD control.
_
Hello.
While this is old "bug" upstream:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8611
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8630
Here,
(FreeBSD clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) 20120523
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0)
Passing -g during linking (which lot's of projects do by
inc
Maybe I should include a question too, so I have better chance
of getting answer :)
Is this intended behaviour?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Clang-g-unused-warnings-in-FreeBSD-linking-tp5727055p5727066.html
Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list arc
On 2012-07-15 15:39, Jakub Lach wrote:
> While this is old "bug" upstream:
>
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8611
>
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8630
>
> Here,
>
> (FreeBSD clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) 20120523
> Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0)
>
> Passin
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 07:32:35PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-07-15 15:39, Jakub Lach wrote:
> > While this is old "bug" upstream:
> >
> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8611
> >
> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8630
> >
> > Here,
> >
> > (FreeBSD clang version 3.1 (b
Thanks, both replies were very informative!
Regarding
> one could argue that passing '-g' to the link stage is nonsensical,
> since ld cannot add debug information, it can only remove it (via the '-s'
> flag).
Is precisely why I was asking If this was conscious decision on FreeBSD
part.
--
Vi
8 matches
Mail list logo