top reports wired memory 128MB
WHERE it is used? below results of vmstat -m and vmstat -z
values does not sum up even to half of it
FreeBSD 9 - few days old.
What i am missing and why there are SO MUCH wired memory on 1GB machine
without X11 or virtualbox
Type InUse MemUse HighUse
input.
Moreover, ifconfig em0 some_valid_fqdn/MASK silently ignores it, so you can't
set valid CIDR address using this notation.
Classful era has ended more than 10 years ago, do we still want to keep this
behavior?
were not aware of that option, and it is rather stupid option - you should
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:54:48 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote:
IV> On 1 June 2012 14:35, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/stuff/spsurvey.py
...
IV> If anyone posts more data, I'll analyse it. I'm more worried about the
IV> granularity of procstat, where it marks the enti
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> input.
>> Moreover, ifconfig em0 some_valid_fqdn/MASK silently ignores it, so you
>> can't set valid CIDR address using this notation.
>>
>> Classful era has ended more than 10 years ago, do we still want to keep
>> this behavior?
>>
> wer
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:31:17AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:54:48 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> IV> On 1 June 2012 14:35, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/stuff/spsurvey.py
>
> ...
>
> IV> If anyone posts more data, I'll analyse i
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:38:22 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KB> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:31:17AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:54:48 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> IV> On 1 June 2012 14:35, Wojciech Puchar
>> wrote:
>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:03:43PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:38:22 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:31:17AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:54:48 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>
> >> IV> On 1 June 2012
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 12:07:40 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KB> Well, if I see a report informing me that some 2M region contains 512 super
KB> pages, how should I interpret it ? For me, it is only one superpage
(mapping)
KB> that can be created in one 2M region.
Well, if I see a report lik
On 9 Jun 2012, at 10:46, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 12:07:40 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> Well, if I see a report informing me that some 2M region contains 512
> super
> KB> pages, how should I interpret it ? For me, it is only one superpage
> (mapping)
> KB> that ca
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:46:53PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 12:07:40 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> Well, if I see a report informing me that some 2M region contains 512
> super
> KB> pages, how should I interpret it ? For me, it is only one superpage
> (ma
On 9 Jun 2012, at 11:05, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> First, there is nothing which would prevent demotion from happens while
> you iterate over the map, so you could get funyy numbers, like 42 superpages
> for 2M region with your method.
>
> Second, the superpage size if machine-depended, and e
Hi,
I build kernel and userland (out of SVN) and install in on an USB key
mounted as /mnt this way:
# cd /usr/src
...
# make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt
# make installkernel DESTDIR=/mnt KERNCONF=GENERIC INSTALL_NODEBUG=t
# make distrib-dirs DESTDIR=/mnt
# make distribution DESTDIR=/mnt
To use
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:28:50AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 09/06/2012 04:16 Jason Hellenthal said the following:
> > runlevel support might be a better solution so it does not differ that
> > much from what other systems do and would be easy for people to grasp.
>
> Patches are welcome,
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:57:41 +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On (07/06/2012 11:56), Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> A user doesn't have to select the option unless he needs to. A "simple
>> user" can just reboot without selecting the option to get back his X. A
>> user doesn't have to learn anything about the
my problem is that the both 'cp -Rp ...' commands takes many hours (12
and six hours) because they are transferring a lot(!!!) of small files; I
unless you want to kill you USB drive quickly (yes, it simulates disk THAT
badly) then create image file on your hard disk exactly equal to your USB
On 06/07/2012 11:10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 07/06/2012 17:29 Doug Barton said the following:
>> On 06/07/2012 02:57 AM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
>>> What do you think about adding generic support for overriding *_enable
>>> options in rc.conf?
>>>
>>> I'd like to be able to disable services at boot pr
On Jun 9, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> To use the (booted) USB key later to install other laptops or netbooks I
> enrich the key with /usr/src and /usr/obj as:
>
> # cd /usr
> # cp -Rp src /mnt/usr
> # cp -Rp obj /mnt/usr
>
> my problem is that the both 'cp -Rp ...' commands takes
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 09:21 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> top reports wired memory 128MB
>
>
> WHERE it is used? below results of vmstat -m and vmstat -z
> values does not sum up even to half of it
> FreeBSD 9 - few days old.
>
> What i am missing and why there are SO MUCH wired memory on 1GB
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:27:03AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 09:21 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > top reports wired memory 128MB
> >
> >
> > WHERE it is used? below results of vmstat -m and vmstat -z
> > values does not sum up even to half of it
> > FreeBSD 9 - few days
On 8-6-2012 22:06, Michael Bushkov wrote:
> I don't know for sure, but it seems that there was no need to support
> anything besides groups and password when nss_compat.c was committed.
> At that time, IIRC, the modules that we had in ports supported only
> these databases.
Right. In the meantime
El día Saturday, June 09, 2012 a las 08:57:33AM -0700, Tim Kientzle escribió:
> On Jun 9, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >
> > To use the (booted) USB key later to install other laptops or netbooks I
> > enrich the key with /usr/src and /usr/obj as:
> >
> > # cd /usr
> > # cp -Rp src
On 06/09/12 10:37, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:28:50AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 09/06/2012 04:16 Jason Hellenthal said the following:
runlevel support might be a better solution so it does not differ that
much from what other systems do and would be easy for people
The kernel auto-tunes the vfs buffer space using the formula "for the
first 64 MB of ram use 1/4 for buffers, plus 1/10 of the ram over 64
i always limit it by
kern.maxbcache=2000
on 1GB RAM machine with lots of I/O but actually with default MAXBSIZE and
little I/O you can use safely 1MB
First, all memory allocated by UMA and consequently malloc(9) is
wired. In other words, almost all memory used by kernel is accounted
as wired.
yes i understand this. still i found no way how to find out what allocated
that much.
Second, the buffer cache wires the pages which are inserted i
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Wojciech Puchar
> wrote:
>>> input.
>>> Moreover, ifconfig em0 some_valid_fqdn/MASK silently ignores it, so you
>>> can't set valid CIDR address using this notation.
>>>
>>> Classful era has ended more than
Hi VirtualBox users!
We are again at the point where I am kindly asking if someone is
interested to help with the VirtualBox on FreeBSD work. We started
with an active team of around 3 people but since about one year I
ended up being a lonely ranger. Maintaining such a beast/high
profile port by
26 matches
Mail list logo
