On Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:41:41 pm Yuri wrote:
> I look at seemingly abandoned sysutils/pstack, last modified upstream
> 2002-11-27.
> It doesn't really work on 9.0 i386, prints some errors.
>
> It's functions, though, is quite desirable if one wants to understand
> why some multithreaded pr
On Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:48:29 pm Mark Saad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:03 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:20:17 pm Mark Saad wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sergey Kandaurov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 21 March 2012 19:19, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
On 04/02/2012 05:31, John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, I don't know if the port has it, but I did some work on pstack a while
ago to make it work with libthread_db so it at least handles i386 ok. It
needs to be modified to use something like libunwind though or some other
unwinder. And possibly it shoul
Basically it consists of (re)compilation and installation of world + kernel
However, 2 parts are always ommited:
Stage 1 - mbr|boot0
Stage 2 - boot
I won't also mention GPT part ...
Stage 3 - loader (is "covered" by world install)
Should it be expanded to world + kernel + bootcodes
The old way, o
On Monday, April 02, 2012 12:39:26 pm Yuri wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 05:31, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't know if the port has it, but I did some work on pstack a while
> > ago to make it work with libthread_db so it at least handles i386 ok. It
> > needs to be modified to use something like l
Hello list,
I am convinced that there is a bug in the CAM code that leads to I/O starvation.
I have already discussed this privately with some. I am now bringing this up to
the general audience to get more feedback.
My setup is that I have 1 RAID controller with 2 arrays connected to
it, da0 and d
On 03/30/2012 07:41, Joe Greco wrote:
>> On 3/29/2012 7:01 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
On 3/28/2012 1:59 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> FreeBSD 8-STABLE, 8.3, and 9.0 are untested
As much as I'm sensitive to your production requirements, realistically
it's not likely that you'll get a he
> On 03/30/2012 07:41, Joe Greco wrote:
> >> On 3/29/2012 7:01 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
> On 3/28/2012 1:59 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> > FreeBSD 8-STABLE, 8.3, and 9.0 are untested
>
> As much as I'm sensitive to your production requirements, realistically
> it's not likely that y
On Saturday, March 31, 2012 5:40:50 pm Maninya M wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> I've tried this. Still getting some allocation problems.
>
> if (temp_regs.r_eax != addr)
> warn("Wanted space at address 0x%.8x, mmap2 system call returned
> 0x%.8x. This could be a problem.",addr,temp_regs.r_eax);
>
> Wh
I'm assessing possible summer of code projects, and the EFI work caught
my attention. I've been running FreeBSD on a macbook for a little under
a year now, and booting on EFI is definitely an interest to me. Does
anyone know if this is still a viable project proposal? I certainly
have the skills
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:48:29 pm Mark Saad wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:03 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:20:17 pm Mark Saad wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sergey Kandaurov
>> >> wro
On 4/2/2012 11:43 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
> As a user, you can't win. If you don't report
> a problem, you get criticized. If you report a problem but can't figure
> out how to reproduce it, you get criticized. If you can reproduce it
> but you don't submit a workaround, you get criticized. If you
> On 4/2/2012 11:43 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
> > As a user, you can't win. If you don't report
> > a problem, you get criticized. If you report a problem but can't figure
> > out how to reproduce it, you get criticized. If you can reproduce it
> > but you don't submit a workaround, you get criticize
cc hackers@
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yongcong Du
Date: Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:23 AM
Subject: [gsoc2012] Port NetBSD's UDF implementation
To: a...@freebsd.org, netch...@freebsd.org
Hi Andriy and Alexander,
Firstly, let me introduce myself;) I'm a graduate student from Shangh
14 matches
Mail list logo