Le 11 mars 2012 à 16:45, Vitaly Magerya a écrit :
> Hi, folks. I'm trying to use pmc(3) to analyze code fragments, and
> I've run into strange behavior: the counter values returned by
> pmc_read(3) sometimes show no increment between readings, but are
> updated a second later; even if the PMC in
Once plugged, usbconfig will show:
ugen0.1: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps)
pwr=SAVE
ugen1.1: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps)
pwr=SAVE
ugen0.2: at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12M)
pwr=SAVE
ugen1.2: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
(480Mbps) pwr=ON
But there is no
Fabien Thomas wrote:
>> So, what's going on here? Is this the intended behavior, or can it
>> be changed? And how do I get accurate readings?
>
> If i remember well:
> The current code will get real HW PMC if the PMC is running and attached to
> owner.
> The first case is not true in your code so
2012/3/12 Vitaly Magerya
> Fabien Thomas wrote:
> >> So, what's going on here? Is this the intended behavior, or can it
> >> be changed? And how do I get accurate readings?
> >
> > If i remember well:
> > The current code will get real HW PMC if the PMC is running and attached
> to owner.
> > The
Hi,
I have solved a following problem. If a big file (according to
'hidirtybuffers') is being written, the write speed is very poor.
It's observed on system with elan 486 and 32MB RAM (i.e., low speed
CPU and not too much memory) running FreeBSD-9.
Analysis: A file is being written. All
Hi,
I solved very curious problem with rarely system (FreeBSD-9)
freezing during reboot. Finally, I found out that system freezes in ep
device callout. The part of device tree is following:
-> pccbb -> pccard -> ep
cbb_pci_shutdown() method in pccbb device places the cards in
reset, tur
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:00:58PM +0100, Svatopluk Kraus wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I have solved a following problem. If a big file (according to
> 'hidirtybuffers') is being written, the write speed is very poor.
>
>It's observed on system with elan 486 and 32MB RAM (i.e., low speed
> CPU and not
I'm using 9.0-RELEASE.
I downloaded the snapshot "9.0-CURRENT-201012" and tried to build it's
kernel but I get this error:
hack.So: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
file reports this:
ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically
linked, not stripped
I comp
CPU architecture and model have a lot to do with performance.
You will also get different results if you used qemu in place of
VirtualBox. Qemu allows you to choose different emulated
architectures, CPUs, and machine bases. What's the downside? You have
to use the command line.
Install qemu and run
2012/3/12 Fernando Apesteguía :
> I'm using 9.0-RELEASE.
>
> I downloaded the snapshot "9.0-CURRENT-201012" and tried to build it's
> kernel but I get this error:
>
> hack.So: could not read symbols: File in wrong format
>
> file reports this:
>
> ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (Fr
10 matches
Mail list logo