В Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:24:42 -0800
Adrian Chadd пишет:
> He's reporting that your ULE work hasn't improved his (very)
> degenerate case.
That's not true!
Thanks!
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Adrian
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , "Andriy Gapon"
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:20:11 -0500
Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
> On Friday, March 02, 2012 2:58:16 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> > -
Right. Is this written up in a PR somewhere explaining the problem in
as much depth has you just have?
And thanks for this, it's great to see some further explanation of the
current issues the scheduler faces.
Adrian
On 2 March 2012 23:40, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> On 03/03/12 05:24,
On 03/03/12 10:59, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Right. Is this written up in a PR somewhere explaining the problem in
as much depth has you just have?
Have no idea. I am new at this area and haven't looked on PRs yet.
And thanks for this, it's great to see some further explanation of the
current issue
On 2 Mar 2012 15:17, wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: John Baldwin
> To: rank1see...@gmail.com
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" , Andriy
Gapon
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:14:43 -0500
> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
>
>
> > > However, avg@ might have foun
- Original Message -
From: Chris Rees
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: Andriy Gapon , hack...@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky
, John Baldwin
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 09:38:26 +
Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
> On 2 Mar 2012 15:17, wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
On 03/03/12 11:12, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 03/03/12 10:59, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Right. Is this written up in a PR somewhere explaining the problem in
as much depth has you just have?
Have no idea. I am new at this area and haven't looked on PRs yet.
And thanks for this, it's great to see so
В Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:54:17 +0200
Alexander Motin пишет:
> On 03/03/12 11:12, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > On 03/03/12 10:59, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> Right. Is this written up in a PR somewhere explaining the problem
> >> in as much depth has you just have?
> >
> > Have no idea. I am new at this a
On 03.03.2012 17:26, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I have FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r232253M
Patch in r232454 broken my DRM
My system patched http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/drm/all.13.5.patch
After build kernel with only r232454 patch Xorg log contains:
...
[ 504.865] [drm] failed to load kernel module "i
On Saturday 03 March 2012 13:30:50 Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 03.03.2012 17:26, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > I have FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r232253M
> > Patch in r232454 broken my DRM
> > My system patched http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/drm/all.13.5.patch
> > After build kernel with only r232454 patch
On 03.03.2012 18:57, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Saturday 03 March 2012 13:30:50 Alexander Motin wrote:
On 03.03.2012 17:26, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
I have FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r232253M
Patch in r232454 broken my DRM
My system patched http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/drm/all.13.5.patch
After build kerne
В Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:30:50 +0200
Alexander Motin пишет:
> On 03.03.2012 17:26, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> > I have FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r232253M
> > Patch in r232454 broken my DRM
> > My system patched http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/drm/all.13.5.patch
> > After build kernel with only r232454 patc
On 03/02/2012 17:07, Gavin Mu wrote:
ports/sysutils/pstack can do this if you use x86 machine.
After fixing obvious compile issues on amd64, symbol "_thread_list"
can't be found. Looks like hash algorithm is correct and finds other
symbols, just not "_thread_list".
I don't know where to go
I'm trying to build r232474 with clang (build environment is 10.0-CURRENT
r231589 amd64 with clang), and I fail on `make -j16 buildworld`. I've tried
with and without threads. I've built so many builds of clang that I can't even
count, so I'm confident my environment is set up properly. I'm bui
On 3/3/2012 6:40 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 03), Brandon Falk said:
I'm trying to build r232474 with clang (build environment is 10.0-CURRENT
r231589 amd64 with clang), and I fail on `make -j16 buildworld`. I've
tried with and without threads. I've built so many builds of c
On 3/3/2012 6:49 PM, Brandon Falk wrote:
On 3/3/2012 6:40 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 03), Brandon Falk said:
I'm trying to build r232474 with clang (build environment is
10.0-CURRENT
r231589 amd64 with clang), and I fail on `make -j16 buildworld`. I've
tried with and witho
In the last episode (Mar 03), Brandon Falk said:
> I'm trying to build r232474 with clang (build environment is 10.0-CURRENT
> r231589 amd64 with clang), and I fail on `make -j16 buildworld`. I've
> tried with and without threads. I've built so many builds of clang that I
> can't even count, so I
On 2012-03-04 00:52, Brandon Falk wrote:
...
> I was trying to navigate the log in `edit`. Now that I'm in vim I
> quickly found the error.
>
> lint: cannot exec /usr/obj/root/src/tmp/usr/bin/cc: No such file or
> directory
> *** [llib-lposix.ln] Error code 1
Huh, that's weird. I see no reason
On 3/3/2012 7:30 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-03-04 00:52, Brandon Falk wrote:
...
I was trying to navigate the log in `edit`. Now that I'm in vim I
quickly found the error.
lint: cannot exec /usr/obj/root/src/tmp/usr/bin/cc: No such file or
directory
*** [llib-lposix.ln] Error code 1
Huh
On 3/3/2012 6:30 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Huh, that's weird. I see no reason that it wouldn't install cc during
the cross-tools stage, unless you have WITHOUT_GCC in your src.conf (and
aren't using WITH_CLANG_IS_CC at the same time).
Can you post your src.conf file, please?
I've had this ha
On 3/3/2012 9:13 PM, Joshua Isom wrote:
On 3/3/2012 6:30 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Huh, that's weird. I see no reason that it wouldn't install cc during
the cross-tools stage, unless you have WITHOUT_GCC in your src.conf (and
aren't using WITH_CLANG_IS_CC at the same time).
Can you post your
21 matches
Mail list logo
