> I had the same issue on my laptop with an eSATA port. I disabled the
> eSATA port and that made the messages go away. According to mav@ these
> were harmless, but annoying.
I've found the topic here:
http://forums.pcbsd.org/showthread.php?t=16055
The problem has been solved by setting "hint.a
--On 29 February 2012 07:50 -0800 Garrett Cooper wrote:
The BIOS has an option for port 60/64 emulation - I've tried enabling it
(didn't seem to make any difference with nothing changed on the FreeBSD
side) - is there any way to coax the system to prefer / use what would
appear to be a PS/2 k
> > Patch fails at 9.0 RELEASE: (Is this for 9 STABLE?)
>
> Nope, patch was made against a 9.0 tree:
>
> % svn info .
> Path: .
> URL: svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.0/sys
> Repository Root: svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base
> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
> Revision
When building world and kernel, I was pissed off with endless amount of output,
as it also makes my eyes into rolling, thus decided to care only for errors.
So I've redirected STDOUT to /dev/null.
Upon error, there is JUST 1 single line of output. Something like:
* 1 error
And that is. N
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> --On 29 February 2012 07:50 -0800 Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>>> The BIOS has an option for port 60/64 emulation - I've tried enabling it
>>> (didn't seem to make any difference with nothing changed on the FreeBSD
>>> side) - is there any way
2012/3/1 :
> When building world and kernel, I was pissed off with endless amount of
> output, as it also makes my eyes into rolling, thus decided to care only for
> errors.
> So I've redirected STDOUT to /dev/null.
> Upon error, there is JUST 1 single line of output. Something like:
>
> *
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:42:27 am rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Patch fails at 9.0 RELEASE: (Is this for 9 STABLE?)
> >
> > Nope, patch was made against a 9.0 tree:
> >
> > % svn info .
> > Path: .
> > URL: svn+ssh://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.0/sys
> > Repository Root: svn+ssh://sv
On 1 Mar 2012 16:31, "Garrett Cooper" wrote:
>
> 2012/3/1 :
> > When building world and kernel, I was pissed off with endless amount of
output, as it also makes my eyes into rolling, thus decided to care only
for errors.
> > So I've redirected STDOUT to /dev/null.
> > Upon error, there is JUST 1
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> On 1 Mar 2012 16:31, "Garrett Cooper" wrote:
>>
>> 2012/3/1 :
>> > When building world and kernel, I was pissed off with endless amount of
>> > output, as it also makes my eyes into rolling, thus decided to care only
>> > for
>> > errors.
>>
- Original Message -
From: Garrett Cooper
To: Chris Rees
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, rank1see...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:38:06 -0800
Subject: Re: src builds and STDERR
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> >
> > On 1 Mar 2012 16:31, "Garrett Cooper" wrote:
> >>
- Original Message -
From: Garrett Cooper
To: Chris Rees
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, rank1see...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:38:06 -0800
Subject: Re: src builds and STDERR
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> >
> > On 1 Mar 2012 16:31, "Garrett Cooper" wrote:
> >>
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky"
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:05:08 -0500
Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
> On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:08:36 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> > - Original Me
On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:46 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Garrett Cooper
> To: Chris Rees
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, rank1see...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:38:06 -0800
> Subject: Re: src builds and STDERR
>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Chri
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:02:35 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: John Baldwin
> To: rank1see...@gmail.com
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky"
> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:05:08 -0500
> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
>
> > On Wednes
- Original Message -
From: Garrett Cooper
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: "Chris Rees" , hack...@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:30:57 -0800
Subject: Re: src builds and STDERR
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:46 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Garr
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin
To: rank1see...@gmail.com
Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky"
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:43:25 -0500
Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
> On Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:02:35 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> > - Original Message
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:58:02 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: John Baldwin
> To: rank1see...@gmail.com
> Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky"
> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:43:25 -0500
> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
>
> > On Thursda
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 4:09:58 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, March 01, 2012 3:58:02 pm rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: John Baldwin
> > To: rank1see...@gmail.com
> > Cc: hack...@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky"
> > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:43:25 -0
On 3/1/2012 1:14 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> My firefox on my BSD desktop was caching the image.
Holding down Shift when clicking reload usually handles this.
hth,
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledg
hi there,
i just noticed that du will not accepts something like the following:
du -t-500M
whereas
du -t500M
will work. i've attached a patch, which makes unit suffixes in connection with
negative thresholds possible.
cheers.
alex
diff --git a/usr.bin/du/du.1 b/usr.bin/du/du.1
index 3db1367..
Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:38:06AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 1 Mar 2012 16:31, "Garrett Cooper" wrote:
> >> See:
> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-December/029852.html
> >> . Why this patch is still not in FreeB
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:38:22PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i just noticed that du will not accepts something like the following:
>
> du -t-500M
>
> whereas
>
> du -t500M
>
> will work. i've attached a patch, which makes unit suffixes in connection with
> negative thresho
I was unable to get this information about the cpuid variable in the
scheduler source code.
How does cpuid get its value from the hardware?
How is the CPUSTATES value obtained/changed with hardware in the source
code?
Which system commands for the above?
--
Maninya
__
23 matches
Mail list logo
