ave done the buildkernel
before isn't it?... for the moment is doing the make release... has
not ended... but was just for sure and relaxed by the way :) :)...
althout I suppose too that if this buildkernel is a needed step make
release will fail basically
So should then be ok in this way I'
And by the way... the previous question made about the need of doing a
buildkernel after the buildworld using Makefile.sysinstall seems not to
be needed because it does during make release proccess
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On Friday, February 17, 2012 2:43:55 am rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
> Anyway, after upgrading to 9.0, my USB stick, when created, started to hang
at stage 2 boot.
> I have a custom setup, where BSD label 'a', has a content of /boot/*
> So when 'a' is being hit by stage 2 boot, there is boot.confi
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 8:06:20 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ian Lepore
> wrote:
> > I've never done this, but if I needed to, I think the first thing I'd
> > try is to use an mmap(2) of /dev/kmem to map the memory you need into
> > userspace (of course your user
On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:59:02 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 01:42, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > The Dragonfly team has recently liberated their VM from the giant lock and
> > there are some interesting benchmarks comparing it to FreeBSD 9 and a
derivative of RedHat Enterprise Linux:
>
On 2/23/12 2:22 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:59:02 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/22/2012 01:42, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> The Dragonfly team has recently liberated their VM from the giant lock and
>>> there are some interesting benchmarks comparing it to FreeBSD 9 and
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 2/23/12 2:22 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:59:02 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 02/22/2012 01:42, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >>> The Dragonfly team has recently liberated their VM from the giant lock
> and th
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 2/23/12 2:22 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:59:02 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 02/22/2012 01:42, Ivan Voras wrote:
The Dragonfly team has recently liberated their VM from the giant lock and
th
Hi hackers. I am seeing an issue where the USB controller is
generating a large number of interrupts.
last pid: 6639; load averages: 1.39, 1.48, 2.46 up 0+01:07:1412:35:05
2590 processes:9 running, 462 sleeping, 3 zombie, 2116 waiting
CPU: 0.2% user, 0.0% nice, 11.5% system, 10.6% inte
On Thursday 23 February 2012 18:52:50 Vijay Singh wrote:
> Hi hackers. I am seeing an issue where the USB controller is
> generating a large number of interrupts.
>
> last pid: 6639; load averages: 1.39, 1.48, 2.46 up 0+01:07:14
> 12:35:05 2590 processes:9 running, 462 sleeping, 3 zombie,
On 02/23/2012 05:22, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 9:59:02 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/22/2012 01:42, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> The Dragonfly team has recently liberated their VM from the giant lock and
>>> there are some interesting benchmarks comparing it to FreeBSD 9 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 02/14/12 10:25, Bernard van Gastel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking through the sources of memmove at [1], and saw a
> (very) small optimization opportunity. The 'memcmp' also compares
> the current character, but the current character is
12 matches
Mail list logo
