Re: 8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot of a (damaged) Compaq Presario

2012-02-17 Thread Uffe Jakobsen
On 2012-02-16 19:21, Alex Goncharov wrote: ,--- I/Alex (Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:34:36 -0500) * | There was one other odd thing that I noticed then: while Debian booted | without a delay, FreeBSD 8 made a long pause after passing the boot | menu: it would display the '/' character and sit there

8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
Sticking with the same list as in my first message re the "8 to 9" surprises: | From: Alex Goncharov | To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org | Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:34:36 -0500 | Subject: 8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot... | | About a week ago, I made a jump and upgraded the system's FreeBS

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 17 February 2012 16:05:42 Alex Goncharov wrote: > <== This is shocking to me: I have the /boot/kernel/snd_hda.ko but I > can't load and unload it -- apparently the sound support is in the > kernel now. Maybe there is a missing depencency towards sound.ko. Try loading that first. --HPS _

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread matt
On 02/17/12 07:12, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 17 February 2012 16:05:42 Alex Goncharov wrote: >> <== This is shocking to me: I have the /boot/kernel/snd_hda.ko but I >> can't load and unload it -- apparently the sound support is in the >> kernel now. > Maybe there is a missing depencenc

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/matt (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:31:03 -0800) * | It's in the kernel in later versions of 9-CURRENT and in 9-RELEASE on. | | You can't kldload or unload it because it's not a module, but part of | the kernel. | That doesn't preclude the presence of the file, I think. | | 'kldstat -v | less'

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Freddie Cash
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Alex Goncharov wrote: > ,--- You/matt (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:31:03 -0800) * > | It's in the kernel in later versions of 9-CURRENT and in 9-RELEASE on. > | > | You can't kldload or unload it because it's not a module, but part of > | the kernel. > | That doesn't p

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Freddie (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:08:18 -0800) * | > So, how do I go about finding and modifying the sound card pin | > assignments in FreeBSD 9?  (If I can't do it without temporarily | > installing FreeBSD 8, it would be a huge disappointment. :) | | Stick the hint into /boot/loader.conf

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

2012-02-17 Thread Alexander Motin
On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Alexander Motin wrote: I've decided to stop those cache black magic practices and focus on things that really exist in this world -- SMT and CPU load. I've dropped most of cache related things from the patch and made the rest of things

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alexander Motin
On 02/17/12 18:20, Alex Goncharov wrote: ,--- You/Freddie (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:08:18 -0800) * |> So, how do I go about finding and modifying the sound card pin |> assignments in FreeBSD 9? (If I can't do it without temporarily |> installing FreeBSD 8, it would be a huge disappointment. :)

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

2012-02-17 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote: >> >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> >>> I've decided to stop those cache black magic practices and focus on >>> things that really exist in this world -- SMT and CPU load. I've

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

2012-02-17 Thread Alexander Motin
On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: On 02/15/12 21:54, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Alexander Motin wrote: I've decided to stop those cache black magic practices and focus on things that really exist in this world --

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Alexander (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:36:53 +0200) * | On 02/17/12 18:20, Alex Goncharov wrote: | > How do I find the correct hint if I can't reload the sound module in | > the new kernel environment and explore 'dmesg', '/dev/sndstat' and the | > physical headphones with the new hint without

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alexander Motin
On 17.02.2012 19:10, Alex Goncharov wrote: ,--- You/Alexander (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:36:53 +0200) * | On 02/17/12 18:20, Alex Goncharov wrote: |> How do I find the correct hint if I can't reload the sound module in |> the new kernel environment and explore 'dmesg', '/dev/sndstat' and the |>

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- I/Alex (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:10:31 -0500) * | Being mostly a FreeBSD freeloader (or a marginal contributor), I | shouldn't be complaining, and I am not, but permit me to make a | personal biased judgment: losing the ability to do a practically | important thing (a dynamic sound card tuning)

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alexander Motin
On 02/17/12 19:43, Alex Goncharov wrote: A technical question: I have the saved (from 8) copies of /boot/device.hints for the laptops in question which have lines like: hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid22.config="as=1 seq=15 device=Headphones" there. What's the best way to use this in 9? To add to the

devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-17 Thread vermaden
Hi, I have finally made some effort on writing flexible yet very simple automounter for FreeBSD desktop. Feel free to submit me BUG reports ;) It currently supports these file formats: -- NTFS(rw) requires [port]sysutils/fusefs-ntfs[/port] -- FAT/FAT32 -- exFAT requires [port]sysutils/fusefs-ex

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Alexander (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:56:18 +0200) * | On 02/17/12 19:43, Alex Goncharov wrote: | > A technical question: I have the saved (from 8) copies of | > /boot/device.hints for the laptops in question which have lines like: | > ... | > What's the best way to use this in 9? To add to

Re: CUDA porting effort?

2012-02-17 Thread Super Bisquit
I'd be willing to try building it on the Power(PC) platform. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote: > Given that NVidia is releasing the CUDA platform source on a limited > basis, is anyone actively working to port it to FreeBSD? The reason I > ask is that to get access to the so

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread matt
On 02/17/12 09:43, Alex Goncharov wrote: > ,--- I/Alex (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:10:31 -0500) * > | Being mostly a FreeBSD freeloader (or a marginal contributor), I > | shouldn't be complaining, and I am not, but permit me to make a > | personal biased judgment: losing the ability to do a practicall

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-17 Thread matt
On 02/17/12 09:49, vermaden wrote: > Hi, > > I have finally made some effort on writing flexible yet very simple > automounter for FreeBSD desktop. > > Feel free to submit me BUG reports ;) > > It currently supports these file formats: > -- NTFS(rw) requires [port]sysutils/fusefs-ntfs[/port] > --

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/matt (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:09:38 -0800) * | For what it's worth, it's just a change in GENERIC. It's not hard to | compile a kernel with different options, That's what I've been doing for years, with e.g. # options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols # de

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread matt
On 02/17/12 11:34, Alex Goncharov wrote: > ,--- You/matt (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:09:38 -0800) * > | For what it's worth, it's just a change in GENERIC. It's not hard to > | compile a kernel with different options, > > That's what I've been doing for years, with e.g. > > # options INET6

Re: Panic in 8.1 in softclock(): mutex Giant not owned at ../../../../sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:185

2012-02-17 Thread Ryan Stone
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Vijay Singh wrote: > I hit the assert in line 405. So right after locking Giant, it is > found unlocked!!! Try running kldload/kldunload with INVARIANTS enabled. I would suspect that you're hitting a case where the kldload code is unlocking Giant when it doesn't

Re: Panic in 8.1 in softclock(): mutex Giant not owned at ../../../../sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:185

2012-02-17 Thread Ryan Stone
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Vijay Singh wrote: >> I hit the assert in line 405. So right after locking Giant, it is >> found unlocked!!! > > Try running kldload/kldunload with INVARIANTS enabled.  I would > suspect that you're hitting a c

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-17 Thread vermaden
I already made some changes for the 'better' ... Here is the latest version: #! /bin/sh PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin LOG="/var/log/automount.log" STATE="/var/run/automount.state" DATEFMT="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S" __create_mount_point() { # /* 1=DEV */ MNT="/mnt/

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/matt (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:45:35 -0800) * | Given that there's apparently little penalty for module vs. kernel, | I can see not including it by default in GENERIC. I do have a | laptop that won't make console tones unless snd_hda is NOT loaded, | which is odd, but never worth debugging

Re: CUDA porting effort?

2012-02-17 Thread Oliver Pinter
CC: Oliver Hartmann On 2/15/12, Eric McCorkle wrote: > Given that NVidia is releasing the CUDA platform source on a limited > basis, is anyone actively working to port it to FreeBSD? The reason I > ask is that to get access to the source, you have to submit a request > explaining what you intend

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread rank1seeker
> For me as a user, that would be a much preferable approach, instilled > long ago by Linux. I don't like unused stuff around, and I like to > understand what I am using. > > Some build kernel confutation parameters "minimum modules", "medium > modules", "maximum modules" might be utilized. I wou

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-17 Thread vermaden
... even newer version, seems to have all 'problems' fixed now ;) #! /bin/sh PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin LOG="/var/log/automount.log" STATE="/var/run/automount.state" DATEFMT="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S" __create_mount_point() { # /* 1=DEV */ MNT="/mnt/$( basename

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/rank1see...@gmail.com (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:08:02 +0100) * | > For me as a user, that would be a much preferable approach, instilled | > long ago by Linux. I don't like unused stuff around, and I like to | > understand what I am using. | > | > Some build kernel confutation parameters "

Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER

2012-02-17 Thread vermaden
Latest version with additional checks for NTFS and FAT32, to be precise, for NTFS filesystem with label "FAT" and for FAT filesystem with label "NTFS" ;) #! /bin/sh PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin LOG="/var/log/automount.log" STATE="/var/run/automount.state" DATE

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread matt
On 02/17/12 14:08, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote: >> For me as a user, that would be a much preferable approach, instilled >> long ago by Linux. I don't like unused stuff around, and I like to >> understand what I am using. >> >> Some build kernel confutation parameters "minimum modules", "medium >>

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Julian Elischer
On 02/17/12 14:08, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote: For me as a user, that would be a much preferable approach, instilled long ago by Linux. I don't like unused stuff around, and I like to understand what I am using. Some build kernel confutation parameters "minimum modules", "medium modules", "maxi

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/17/2012 15:11, matt wrote: > We have a modular kernel. It makes best-practices-sense to keep the > kernel true to what's required to boot and initialize the hardware > required to come up multiuser. I am actually against having sound in > there at all. I think the question is not, "What shou

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread matt
On 02/17/12 16:32, Julian Elischer wrote: >> On 02/17/12 14:08, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote: For me as a user, that would be a much preferable approach, instilled long ago by Linux. I don't like unused stuff around, and I like to understand what I am using. Some build kerne

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread matt
On 02/17/12 17:14, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/17/2012 15:11, matt wrote: >> We have a modular kernel. It makes best-practices-sense to keep the >> kernel true to what's required to boot and initialize the hardware >> required to come up multiuser. I am actually against having sound in >> there at a

Why /dev/dsp can get into "Device busy" state?

2012-02-17 Thread Yuri
At some point, after killing audio playing app with Ctrl-C, I am unable to play sound again with the same app: Can't open audio device /dev/dsp: Device busy But after closing virtual box windows guest, sound is working again. What bothers me, why audio device can even become busy? Isn't it supp

Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

2012-02-17 Thread Alex Goncharov
,--- You/Doug (Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:14:24 -0800) * | I think the question is not, "What should be in the kernel?" but rather | "What should be on by default?" *How* those things are provided is a | different question. | | One could argue that an intelligent installer combined with a more | modu