On 23/08/2011 03:23, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Aug-22 12:45:08 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
It would be suboptimal but only for the slight waste of space that would
have otherwise been reclaimed if the block or fragment size remained 512
or 2K. This waste of space is insignificant for the vast ma
On 23 August 2011 10:52, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> I agree but there are at least two things going for making the increase
> anyway:
>
> 1) 2 TB drives cost $80
> 2) Where the space is really important, the person in charge usually knows
> it and can choose a non-default size like 512b fragments.
>
>
On 23/08/2011 11:59, Aled Morris wrote:
On 23 August 2011 10:52, Ivan Voras wrote:
I agree but there are at least two things going for making the increase
anyway:
1) 2 TB drives cost $80
2) Where the space is really important, the person in charge usually knows
it and can choose a non-defaul
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:23:15 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi hackers,
> I noticed that if anything fails while initializing a driver, the
> driver stays attached to the kernel as a module instead of being
> kicked when all references to the driver go to 0. Is this desired
> behavior (it
Yes, the subject sounds quite hairy, so please let me try to explain it.
First, let's consider one concrete function:
static int
ukbd_poll(keyboard_t *kbd, int on)
{
struct ukbd_softc *sc = kbd->kb_data;
if (!mtx_owned(&Giant)) {
/* XXX cludge */
i
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 22:15:47 -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Test Rat wrote:
> > timp writes:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >> I just tried you patch on latest current with clang.
> >>
> >> [root@current64 /usr/src]# uname -a
> >> FreeBSD current64 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 21 Aug 2011 13:39, "kilian" wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > the idea to start services concurrently during boot isn't new and the
> > question why FreeBSD doesn't do it has popped up on the forum and
> > mailing list occasionally. So,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 22:15:47 -0500, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Test Rat wrote:
>> > timp writes:
>> >
>> >> Hi!
>> >> I just tried you patch on latest current with clang.
>> >>
>> >> [root@current64 /usr/src
8 matches
Mail list logo
