Hi Eygene,
> Daniel, good day.
>
> Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:04:27PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > this code behaves correctly when run from a diskless host which
> > booted via PXE, but fails on a host that was booted from disk.
> > hint: the non working sends a packet with a non ethernet broad
on 19/07/2011 03:19 Brandon Falk said the following:
> On 7/18/2011 10:18 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 18/07/2011 17:53 Brandon Falk said the following:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In recent branches (confirmed with 224119) builds compiled with clang
>>> happen to
>>> throw 'Unknown error: -512' in a lot
On 2011-07-18 16:53, Brandon Falk wrote:
In recent branches (confirmed with 224119) builds compiled with clang
happen to throw 'Unknown error: -512' in a lot of places, making the
system unusable. (Untested on gcc compiled systems).
I have never seen this, neither with clang-compiled nor gcc-co
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Brandon Falk wrote:
> On 7/18/2011 10:18 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> on 18/07/2011 17:53 Brandon Falk said the following:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In recent branches (confirmed with 224119) builds compiled with clang
>>> happen to
>>> throw 'Unknown error: -512' in
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Brandon Falk wrote:
>> On 7/18/2011 10:18 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> on 18/07/2011 17:53 Brandon Falk said the following:
Hello,
In recent branches (confirmed with 224119) builds com
2011/7/5 Alexander Kabaev :
> The slow way would be the right way if you were inclined to really take
> it. Once old releases of tools that can be broken by the new macro
> use are long and forgotten we can start on relying on said macro, but
> not before.
Given that your main concern is backward
On Monday, July 18, 2011 3:40:19 am Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/17/2011 20:40, Devin Teske wrote:
> > What release are you running?
>
> Recent HEAD
I upgraded my desktop at home to HEAD yesterday and tested this via a 'boot
kernel.GENERIC' at the loader prompt and it did the same as the previous
On 7/19/2011 7:31 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Brandon Falk wrote:
On 7/18/2011 10:18 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 18/07/2011 17:53 Brandon Falk said the following:
Hello,
In recent branches (confirmed with
On 7/19/2011 5:14 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-07-18 16:53, Brandon Falk wrote:
In recent branches (confirmed with 224119) builds compiled with clang
happen to throw 'Unknown error: -512' in a lot of places, making the
system unusable. (Untested on gcc compiled systems).
I have never seen
Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:40:11AM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > And that non-broadcast ethernet address is the MAC of your
> > default router?
> yes.
Fine, that is more-or-less expected, since the network subsystem
just routes 255.255.255.255 to the default gateway. The issue
you're seeing were
I have a Cisco ASA which expects a different tunnel for each IP that
I'm sending traffic to (ie: it expects a different tunnel per firewall
rule over there). It looks like I should have each SA in a different
domain on my side to do this --- so it looks like I should be using
the "-ctx" flag to se
> Why on earth would you want this?
Hi. Since your quote of my note was not to the original,
I'll repost it here. Kurt Lidl also posted useful situations
on these lists. Also, being able to have time tick backwards
in jails could be interesting fuzzing too :-) Enjoy.
Would be nice to be able to
On 7/19/2011 10:31 AM, Brandon Falk wrote:
On 7/19/2011 5:14 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-07-18 16:53, Brandon Falk wrote:
In recent branches (confirmed with 224119) builds compiled with clang
happen to throw 'Unknown error: -512' in a lot of places, making the
system unusable. (Untested o
13 matches
Mail list logo
