Re: [PATCH] __FreeBSD_kernel__

2011-07-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/7/5 Ed Maste : >> On the topic of where such a macro should be defined I originally had >> no strong opinion.  However, valid points have been raised about >> compiling software for FreeBSD using compilers that are not the one in >> the

Re: strange 'vmstat -z' output

2011-07-06 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 6 July 2011 05:08, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:40:54AM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >> On 6 July 2011 02:46, Alexander Best wrote: >> > hi there, >> > >> > i'm seeing the following with 'vmstat -z' on CURRENT, running on amd64: >> > >> > ITEM                   SI

Re: strange 'vmstat -z' output

2011-07-06 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Jul 6 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 6 July 2011 02:46, Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > i'm seeing the following with 'vmstat -z' on CURRENT, running on amd64: > > > > ITEM                   SIZE  LIMIT     USED     FREE      REQ FAIL SLEEP > > 128 Bucket:            1048,  

Re: what is the RIGHT(TM) way to configure background DHCP?

2011-07-06 Thread deeptec...@gmail.com
(i intend the discussion to take place primarily on the freebsd-hackers list, i'm CCing the freebsd-current list for a reason stated below.) (original first post: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-June/231301.html) On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Y

Re: what is the RIGHT(TM) way to configure background DHCP?

2011-07-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote: > (i intend the discussion to take place primarily on the > freebsd-hackers list, i'm CCing the freebsd-current list for a reason > stated below.) > > (original first post: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-June

Re: what is the RIGHT(TM) way to configure background DHCP?

2011-07-06 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote: > the boot process of my FreeBSD machines takes a relatively long time. > it spends 30 seconds idling at some point, because my network > interface (sk0) is supposed to have an IP address assigned via DHCP, > and the DHCP server on my LA