Hello,
exists there some unit tests for FreeBSD kernel APIs, e.g. mutex(9),
condvar(9), etc.?
Have a nice day!
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.hu..
On Friday 24 June 2011 09:22:57 Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky :
> > Updated bus_auto.conf:
> >
> > http://hselasky.homeunix.org:8192/bus_auto.conf
>
> Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding numbers?
> It makes the output much easier to understand.
2011/6/23 Warner Losh :
> How'd you go about generating all these .conf files?
I have to admit it was quite boring, lots of grep & sed, different
regex for each file, then some manual editting.
But I see that someone has found a better way. I'll look into testing that :-)
> I don't see where yo
2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky :
> Updated bus_auto.conf:
>
> http://hselasky.homeunix.org:8192/bus_auto.conf
Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding numbers? It
makes the output much easier to understand.
--
Robert Millan
___
On Friday 24 June 2011 14:59:37 Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky :
> >> Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding
> >> numbers? It makes the output much easier to understand.
> >
> > To save memory.
>
> I haven't inspected devd code, but I was under the
On Friday, June 24, 2011 3:23:11 am Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> exists there some unit tests for FreeBSD kernel APIs, e.g. mutex(9),
> condvar(9), etc.?
>
> Have a nice day!
Hmm, I have a kernel module that does some tests, but it is not in the tree.
One of the issues is that many of t
2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky :
>> Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding numbers?
>> It makes the output much easier to understand.
>
> To save memory.
I haven't inspected devd code, but I was under the assumption that
variables only lived untill resolved. What would be
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:14 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2011 3:23:11 am Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> exists there some unit tests for FreeBSD kernel APIs, e.g. mutex(9),
>> condvar(9), etc.?
>>
>> Have a nice day!
>
> Hmm, I have a kernel module that does some tests, b
On Jun 24, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 24 June 2011 14:59:37 Robert Millan wrote:
>> 2011/6/24 Hans Petter Selasky :
Very nice. But why not use variable names instead of hardcoding
numbers? It makes the output much easier to understand.
>>>
>>> To save mem
We're trying to get our machines IPv6 enabled but in doing so this
seems to break java apps using openjdk6 for UDP sends.
The server seems quite happy to send and receive TCP packets on
IPv6 socket that are bound to IPv4 addresses, but the same is not
true for UDP.
The socket bind works fine and
Removing -java@ list because the VM is an application on top of the
kernel's network stack, and the issue isn't Java-specific.
Am 24.06.2011 23:11, schrieb Steven Hartland:
> We're trying to get our machines IPv6 enabled but in doing so this
> seems to break java apps using openjdk6 for UDP sends.
11 matches
Mail list logo