It looks like our /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors list (used only by pciconf as
far as I can tell) has become rather stale. We also appear to be tracking
sources which no longer exist.
Would anyone object if I updated this list to source the same database used by
Linux distributions at http://pciids.
On 2011-04-04 16:10:16 (+0200), Philip Paeps wrote:
> Would anyone object if I updated this list to source the same database used
> by Linux distributions at http://pciids.sourceforge.net/v2.2/pci.ids?
It occurs to me that people would want to verify that this list does actually
work and that we
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 2011-04-04 16:10:16 (+0200), Philip Paeps wrote:
>> Would anyone object if I updated this list to source the same database used
>> by Linux distributions at http://pciids.sourceforge.net/v2.2/pci.ids?
>
> It occurs to me that people would w
on 04/04/2011 17:10 Philip Paeps said the following:
> It looks like our /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors list (used only by pciconf as
> far as I can tell) has become rather stale. We also appear to be tracking
> sources which no longer exist.
>
> Would anyone object if I updated this list to source
On 2011-04-04 07:31:53 (-0700), Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > On 2011-04-04 16:10:16 (+0200), Philip Paeps wrote:
> >> Would anyone object if I updated this list to source the same database used
> >> by Linux distributions at http://pciids.source
On 2011-04-04 17:39:22 (+0300), Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 04/04/2011 17:10 Philip Paeps said the following:
> > It looks like our /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors list (used only by pciconf as
> > far as I can tell) has become rather stale. We also appear to be tracking
> > sources which no longer exis
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 2011-04-04 17:39:22 (+0300), Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 04/04/2011 17:10 Philip Paeps said the following:
>> > It looks like our /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors list (used only by pciconf as
>> > far as I can tell) has become rather stale. We a
On 2011-04-04 08:51:03 (-0700), Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > On 2011-04-04 17:39:22 (+0300), Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 04/04/2011 17:10 Philip Paeps said the following:
> >> > Would anyone object if I updated this list to source the same datab
Philip Paeps ha scritto:
This is just for your information:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/127979/focus=128577
Maybe you'll find something useful there.
Thanks. I've just read through that discussion. It doesn't look like there
were any "serious" objections to pulling in the
On 2011-04-04 17:44:29 (+0200), Alex Dupre wrote:
> Philip Paeps ha scritto:
> >> This is just for your information:
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.current/127979/focus=128577
> >> Maybe you'll find something useful there.
> >
> > Thanks. I've just read through that discussion. It
On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
>>> I think we should just go with the new list, but I'll hold off for a bit
>>> to let others object. ;)
>>
>> +1, just for the fact that our sources are becoming stale. I wonder though
>> what other OSes like NetBSD/OpenBSD/[Open]Solaris/IlluminO
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=129996
Domagoj S.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 04/04/2011 07:10, Philip Paeps wrote:
It looks like our /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors list (used only by pciconf as
far as I can tell) has become rather stale. We also appear to be tracking
sources which no longer exist.
Would anyone object if I updated this list to source the same database us
On 2011-04-04 11:04:38 (-0700), Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 07:10, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > It looks like our /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors list (used only by pciconf
> > as far as I can tell) has become rather stale. We also appear to be
> > tracking sources which no longer exist.
> >
> > Wo
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=129996
gordon@'s observation seems valid:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=130007&postcount=2 ?
Your other question about grep returning 141 was because it caught
SIGPIPE, so probably a *csh bug (
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 07:10, Philip Paeps wrote:
>>
>> It looks like our /usr/share/misc/pci_vendors list (used only by pciconf
>> as
>> far as I can tell) has become rather stale. We also appear to be tracking
>> sources which no longer exist.
>>
>>
On 04/04/2011 20:30, Garrett Cooper wrote:
1. People may have automation that depends on this output.
To the extent that they rely on information that is out of date, fixing
this is a feature. However I cannot imagine that this would be much of
an issue.
2. Some braindead SCMs may be probl
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/04/2011 20:30, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> 1. People may have automation that depends on this output.
>
> To the extent that they rely on information that is out of date, fixing this
> is a feature. However I cannot imagine that this would
On 04/04/2011 21:36, Garrett Cooper wrote:
2. Some braindead SCMs may be problematic with this change (p4?*COUGH*).
>
> Eh? I don't parse this.
perforce doesn't always grok large changes (especially deletions -- it
gets ditzy). The last change that was committed by someone at $WORK to
this fil
19 matches
Mail list logo
