Re: libdispatch don't build on 8.2-RELEASE amd64

2011-02-27 Thread Danilo Egea
Worked with GCC, but support blocks is disabled... :( On 2/27/11 1:42 AM, Danilo Egea wrote: Hi guys, Anyone know what's going on? PS: with clang-devel libtool: compile: clang -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../config -I.. -I.. -fPIC -MT time.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/time.Tpo -c shims/time.c -fPIC -DPI

Is pthread_cond_signal(3) man page correct?

2011-02-27 Thread Yuri
On FreeBSD-8.1 this page says: The pthread_cond_signal() function unblocks one thread waiting for the condition variable cond. On Linux it says: The /pthread_cond_signal/() function shall unblock at least one of the threads that are blocked on the specified condition variable /cond/ (if any t

Re: Is pthread_cond_signal(3) man page correct?

2011-02-27 Thread Yuri
Forwarding to standards@ and davidxu@ per Garrett Cooper suggestion. Also I want to add that I came to this question while observing behavior consistent with multiple wakeup on FreeBSD-8.1. The heavily multi-threaded code that assumes that only one thread can be woken up by one pthread_cond_si

Re: seeking into /dev/{null,zero}

2011-02-27 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Feb 23 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > On Wed Feb 23 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Feb 22, 2011, at 9:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >> > On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:46:05 am Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> >> (Please bottom post

Re: Is pthread_cond_signal(3) man page correct?

2011-02-27 Thread David Xu
On 2011/02/28 05:26, Yuri wrote: > Forwarding to standards@ and davidxu@ per Garrett Cooper suggestion. > > Also I want to add that I came to this question while observing behavior > consistent with multiple wakeup on FreeBSD-8.1. The heavily > multi-threaded code that assumes that only one thread

Re: Is pthread_cond_signal(3) man page correct?

2011-02-27 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Feb 27, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Yuri wrote: > Forwarding to standards@ and davidxu@ per Garrett Cooper suggestion. > > Also I want to add that I came to this question while observing behavior > consistent with multiple wakeup on FreeBSD-8.1. The heavily multi-threaded > code that assumes that on

Re: Is pthread_cond_signal(3) man page correct?

2011-02-27 Thread Pieter de Goeje
On Sunday 27 February 2011 22:26:18 Yuri wrote: > Also I want to add that I came to this question while observing behavior > consistent with multiple wakeup on FreeBSD-8.1. The heavily > multi-threaded code that assumes that only one thread can be woken up by > one pthread_cond_signal call crashes,