On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:45:08 am Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 16.11.2010 16:29, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Err, are there no longer hard links to all of the frontends for a given
> > crunch? If so, that is a problem as it will make rescue much harder to use.
>
> Yes, probably this patch is
Hi,
Running something like below under VirtualBox (CURRENT, VIMAGE)
echo "creating jail and iface"
jail -c name="${JAIL}" vnet persist
ifconfig "${EPAIR}" create
ifconfig "${EPAIR}b" vnet "${JAIL}"
sleep 1
echo "destroying jail and iface"
# below is a race
jail -r
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hi,
Running something like below under VirtualBox (CURRENT, VIMAGE)
...
So the question is who is guilty in this situation? ULE? flowtable? Or
jail/epair, which should not allow simultaneous entering of flowtable_flush?
In general: you for running a
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
BAZ> Hi,
>> Running something like below under VirtualBox (CURRENT, VIMAGE)
BAZ> ...
>> So the question is who is guilty in this situation? ULE? flowtable? Or
>> jail/epair, which
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> I think net@ would have been a better initial place but since this
BAZ> seems to be a problem when interacting with VIMAGE
BAZ> freebsd-virtualization might be better.
BAZ> What you could try is:
BAZ> http://people.freebsd.
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Hey,
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> I think net@ would have been a better initial place but since this
BAZ> seems to be a problem when interacting with VIMAGE
BAZ> freebsd-virtualization might be better.
BAZ> What
If received an interrupt while in protected-mode and paging enabled,
is linear address from IDT stored at the idtr translated using the
paging-hierarchy structures?
I have looked at the interrupt/exception chapter in the corresponding
Intel manual but can't find the answer. Maybe I overlooked.
Than
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 20:04:35 + (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> How do you reproduce the crash? Is it just another ifioctl race as
BAZ> from kern/146250?
Using the same script I posted in my first mail, removing a jail and epair
interface simultaneously:
ifconfig epair0b vnet myjail
Trying to do a complete solution for kern/145385, Andriy has
raised concerns about IRQ mapping to CPUs; while I've have put
together more pieces of the puzzle, I'm a bit confused how I determine
whether or not an IRQ is available for use.
Sure, I could linear probe a series of IRQs, but tha
9 matches
Mail list logo
