Re: [PATCH] update to the latest libedit version and remove libreadline deps

2010-11-06 Thread Anonymous
Anonymous writes: > Anonymous writes: > >> Baptiste Daroussin writes: > [...] >>> You can find the patch against current here: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/update-libedit.patch >> >> $ make depend >> /usr/src/lib/libedit/makelist -h /usr/src/lib/libedit/vi.c > vi.h.tmp && >> mv vi

Re: txt-sysinstall scrapped

2010-11-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > On 11/06/2010 00:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote: Just to add to that (because I do find it a novel idea), 1) how are you going to properly prevent man in the middle attacks (SSL, TLS,

Re: txt-sysinstall scrapped

2010-11-06 Thread Warner Losh
On 11/06/2010 01:38, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:49 PM, Warner Losh wrote: On 11/06/2010 00:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote: Just to add to that (because I do find it a novel idea), 1) how are you going to properly prevent m

[PATCH] mptutil(8) - capture errors and percolate up to caller

2010-11-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
Similar to r214396, this patch deals with properly capturing error and passing it up to the caller in mptutil just in case the errno value gets stomped on by warn*(3); this patch deals with an improper use of warn(3), and also some malloc(3) errors, as well as shrink down some static buffers to

Re: [PATCH] update to the latest libedit version and remove libreadline deps

2010-11-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Thanks all for your returns, I'll update my patch during the next week. Concerning the reverts I'll try to reintegrate them and then send them to upstream, Because I think it is better to keep in sync to easier futures updates. regards, Bapt ___ freebsd

Re: txt-sysinstall scrapped

2010-11-06 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 11/06/10 01:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >>> Just to add to that (because I do find it a novel idea), 1) how >>> are you going to properly prevent man in the middle attacks (SSL, TLS, >>> etc?), and 2) what webserver would you use? >> >> ht

Re: Userland debug symbols directory

2010-11-06 Thread Ed Maste
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:45:19PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > I like the idea a lot, but why not to leave symbol files in /usr/obj, The application where this is most useful (and why we implemented it originally) is the case where /usr/obj isn't available - for instance, a binary installation o

Re: Userland debug symbols directory

2010-11-06 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:20PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:45:19PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > > I like the idea a lot, but why not to leave symbol files in /usr/obj, > > The application where this is most useful (and why we implemented it > originally) is the case

Re: Userland debug symbols directory

2010-11-06 Thread Ed Maste
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:56:03PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:20PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:45:19PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > > > > I like the idea a lot, but why not to leave symbol files in /usr/obj, > > > > The application w

[PATCH] Simplify uart_bus_pci_probe

2010-11-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
Some of the logic could have been simplified in the probe. The proposed patch makes the detection process a tad bit more straightforward. Comments, review (and maybe a commit :P) are more than welcome :). Thanks! -Garrett uart-bus-probe-minor-cleanup.patch Description: Binary data ___

Re: [PATCH] Simplify uart_bus_pci_probe

2010-11-06 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:22:53 -0700 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Some of the logic could have been simplified in the probe. The > proposed patch makes the detection process a tad bit more > straightforward. > Comments, review (and maybe a commit :P) are more than welcome :). > Thanks! > -Garrett

Re: [PATCH] Add -lssp_nonshared to GCC's LIB_SPEC unconditionally

2010-11-06 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:00:23PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:39:06 +0100 > Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > > Hi Kib, > > > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:18:04PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:44:57PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > >

Re: txt-sysinstall scrapped

2010-11-06 Thread Devin Teske
On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 11/06/10 01:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote: Just to add to that (because I do find it a novel idea), 1) how are you going to properly prevent man in the middle attacks (SSL, TLS

Re: Userland debug symbols directory

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Johnston
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 02:04:20PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:56:03PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:20PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 10:45:19PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > > > > > > > I like the idea a lot, but

Re: txt-sysinstall scrapped

2010-11-06 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Nov 6, 2010, at 1:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> On 11/06/10 01:04, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >Just to add to that (because I do find it a novel idea), 1) how > are you go

Re: txt-sysinstall scrapped

2010-11-06 Thread Tim Kientzle
On Nov 5, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Friday, November 05, 2010 11:48:27 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>> Just to add to that (because I do find it a novel idea), 1) how >>> are you going to properly prevent man in the middle attacks (SSL, TLS, >>> etc?), and 2) what webserver woul