Hi,
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:18:58PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 14:40:27 +0200
> Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
>
> > Since 8.1 (8.0?), after calling bsdlabel, I still have /dev/${dev}a,
> > but/dev/${dev}c doesn't show up anymore.
>
> The 'c' partition is no longer created on F
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/7/10 12:23 AM, jhell wrote:
>>
>> Alright thank you for your explanation. I do not normally see this usage
>> and this just sort of stood out at me and I did not want to assume what
>> you were trying to accomplish, without asking.
>
On Oct 9, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 10/7/10 12:23 AM, jhell wrote:
>>>
>>> Alright thank you for your explanation. I do not normally see this usage
>>> and this just sort of stood out at me and I did not want to ass
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Oct 9, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> On 10/7/10 12:23 AM, jhell wrote:
Alright thank you for your explanation. I do not normally see this usage
an
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>>> Hello fellow freebsd-hackers,
>>>
>>> Long-time hacker, first-time poster.
>>>
>>> I'd like to share a shell script that I wrote for
On Oct 9, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
Hello fellow freebsd-hackers,
Long-time hacker, first-time po
D&I of the FreeBSD Operating System says it's gonna refer to the BSD default
scheduler, the 'time share scheduler' does this mean sched_4BSD.c(In the
introduction section of Chapter 4) handles only time-share process?
If so, then how (or where) are the kernel processes/real time process
scheduled?
Forgive me for this top posting but I don't want to risk ruining the perfect
flow of Garret's analysis.
I read through it as if I was in a classroom lecture.
I have a special folder in kmail called "FreeBSD Tops" where I put mail that
makes me discover something unknown to me about FBSD, and t
Trimming out some context...
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
...
> Should this really be set to something other than 0 or 1 by the
> end-user's environment? This would simplify a lot of return/exit
> calls...
>
> A scenario that I envision that almost never arises, but...
>
Ah grasshoppers...
/me wonders if anyone will get the full significance of that..
On 10/9/10 3:39 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Why not just do...
if [ "x$rc_conf_files" = x -o "x$varname" = x ]
then
return ${FAILURE-1}
fi
I think you'll fin
On 10/9/10 7:30 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[ "..." ] is the same thing as [ -n "..." ] or test -n "..."
[ ! "..." ] is the same things as [ -z "..." ] or test -z "..."
I'll never understand why people have to throw an extra letter in there and
then compare it to that letter.
I ran into issues
11 matches
Mail list logo
