Just as much as top-posting I would say ;)
On 09/27/2010 00:13, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Isn't that a step backwards?
>
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Greg Lewis wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:34:34PM -0400, jhell wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2010 22:47, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I currently u
Hi Kostik,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:27:08PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> You make the script only useful for the stack protection. If build process
> does not use libc.so script, but installed system does, you
> - require to maintain two places where (not much) hypothetical libc
> change
Hello,
In /etc/rc.subr, at line 231, there is:
if [ ! -f $_pidfile ]; then
debug "pid file ($_pidfile): not readable."
return
fi
Is check "[ ! -r $_pidfile ]" more correct?
--
Dmitry Banshchikov
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 26 September 2010 21:45, jhell wrote:
> This is more for questions@ or pf@
>
> On 09/26/2010 11:43, Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Powell >wrote:
> >
> >> Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-t
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:28:30 -0400
jhell wrote:
> Just as much as top-posting I would say ;)
>
> On 09/27/2010 00:13, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> > Isn't that a step backwards?
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Greg Lewis wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:34:34PM -0400, jhell wrote:
>
On 2010-09-27 04:47, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I currently use:
csup -h cvsup9.us.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile
and when I just ran it I got:
Append to CVSROOT-src/access
Edit CVSROOT-src/access,v
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Unfortunately, the access,v file in the ma
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:04:21PM +0400, Dmitry Banshchikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In /etc/rc.subr, at line 231, there is:
>
> if [ ! -f $_pidfile ]; then
> debug "pid file ($_pidfile): not readable."
> return
> fi
>
> Is check "[ ! -r $_pidfile ]" more correct?
There's pratically no differen
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:01:29PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:04:21PM +0400, Dmitry Banshchikov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In /etc/rc.subr, at line 231, there is:
> >
> > if [ ! -f $_pidfile ]; then
> > debug "pid file ($_pidfile): not readable."
> > return
> > fi
>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:46:51AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi Kostik,
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:27:08PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > You make the script only useful for the stack protection. If build process
> > does not use libc.so script, but installed system does, you
> >
On Friday, September 24, 2010 9:00:44 pm Neel Natu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes the bogus error message from bus_dmamem_alloc() about
> the buffer not being aligned properly.
>
> The problem is that the check is against a virtual address as opposed
> to the physical address. contigmalloc() m
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:13:14AM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> Isn't that a step backwards?
Segfaulting seems like a bigger step backwards to me ;)
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Greg Lewis wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:34:34PM -0400, jhell wrote:
> >> On 09/26/2010 22:47, Aryeh
Hello,
I would like to use the clogf(3) function from complex.h, but it seems
there is no such function implemented on FreeBSD (8.1-STABLE). Am I
missing something or is there any way to work this around?
Thanks,
:g
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m
Hi John,
Thanks for reviewing this.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:04 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, September 24, 2010 9:00:44 pm Neel Natu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes the bogus error message from bus_dmamem_alloc() about
>> the buffer not being aligned properly.
>>
>> The problem is
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:31:40PM +0200, P?LI G?bor J?nos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to use the clogf(3) function from complex.h, but it seems
> there is no such function implemented on FreeBSD (8.1-STABLE). Am I
> missing something or is there any way to work this around?
>
http://www.
14 matches
Mail list logo