Brandon Gooch wrote:
> One thing I see:
>
> Where is *frame pointing to? It isn't initialized in the function, so...
Thanks! Fixed. Patch updated.
> Also, for those of us testing, should we "reset" our timer settings
> back to defaults and work from there[1] (meaning, should we be futzing
> arou
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:10:00 +0300
Alexander Motin wrote:
> I have actively tested this code for a few days on my amd64 Core2Duo
> laptop and i386 Core-i5 desktop system. With C2/C3 states enabled
> systems experience only about 100-150 interrupts per second, having HZ
> set to 1000. These events
On 8/29/10 9:39 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
>>
>> Ok. How about this?
>>
>> Firefox items:
>> 1. What version of Firefox are you using?
>
> Firefox 3.6.4. Lastest from ports, compiled now.
>
New install, or did you update firefox from a previous version? If the
latter (may be worth trying regard
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> Hmm. I applied your patches and am now running the new kernel. But I
> only installed the new kernel and didn't do make buildworld installworld.
>
> Mu systat -vm 1 doesn't look anything like yours. I'm seeing about 2300
> interrupts per second and most of those are comi
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > Hmm. I applied your patches and am now running the new kernel. But I
> > only installed the new kernel and didn't do make buildworld installworld.
> >
> > Mu systat -vm 1 doesn't look anything like yours. I'
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
> Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>> Ah, I think I see it now. My desktop has only C1 enabled. Is that it?
>>> Unfortunately, it appears that only C1 is supported :(
>> Yes, as I have said, at this moment empty ticks ski
On Sun Aug 29 10, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > just discovered this issue while going through some linux mailinglists:
> >
> > otaku% dd if=/dev/urandom of=testfile bs=1 count=42
> > 42+0 records in
> > 42+0 records out
> > 42 bytes transferred
Ilya Bakulin writes:
> So, ad7p1.nop is shifted by 512 bytes and resides right on the
> beginning of the physical sector. And it has 4096 "sector" size.
Why did you shift the gnop? Did you short jumper 7-8?
> For some reason, phybs begins with sector size 8192... I expected it
> to begin with 4
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
(snip)
> > So, what else did you do to reduce interrupts so much?
> >
> > Ah, I think I see it now. My desktop has only C1 enabled. Is that it?
> > Unfortunately, it appears that only C1 is supported :(
>
> Yes,
YAMAMOTO, Taku wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
> Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> (snip)
>>> So, what else did you do to reduce interrupts so much?
>>>
>>> Ah, I think I see it now. My desktop has only C1 enabled. Is that it?
>>> Unfortunately, it appears that only C
Thiago Damas writes:
> "ATA 4K sector issues"
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2010-March/031154.html
Yes, we know. That's what this entire thread (and a zillion others
before it) is about.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
В Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:05:37 +0200
Dag-Erling Smørgrav пишет:
> Ilya Bakulin writes:
> > So, ad7p1.nop is shifted by 512 bytes and resides right on the
> > beginning of the physical sector. And it has 4096 "sector" size.
>
> Why did you shift the gnop? Did you short jumper 7-8?
No, 7-8 remained
Alexander Best writes:
> *hehehe* that might be true. maybe they've bought the src from AT&T? anyway i
> don't think the BSD license restricts you releasing code under a new license.
> so what they did seems fine to me.
You can release the code under a different license, but you still have
to inc
On Mon Aug 30 10, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Alexander Best writes:
> > *hehehe* that might be true. maybe they've bought the src from AT&T? anyway
> > i
> > don't think the BSD license restricts you releasing code under a new
> > license.
> > so what they did seems fine to me.
>
> You can re
Ilya Bakulin writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Why did you shift the gnop? Did you short jumper 7-8?
> No, 7-8 remained as-is. ad7p1 was created using:
> #gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 10G -b 63 ad7
>
> So it begins at sector #63, but physical 4096-block begins at logical
> sector 64. Tha
On Friday, August 27, 2010 4:11:41 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> Hi,
> from "FreeBSD Developers' Handbook, 10.7 Debugging Loadable Modules Using
> GDB":
> "...
> (kgdb) add-symbol-file /sys/modules/linux/linux.ko 0xc0ae22d0
> ...
> "
> Actually I couldn't debug my modules using .ko-file. Moreover, I'
On Sunday, August 29, 2010 10:18:48 am Davide Italiano wrote:
> Hi.
> I'm running 8.1 on my Sony Vaio laptop, with dwm as window manager on
> lastest Xorg on ports.
> When I'm trying to run firefox3, the system "freezes" unexpectly. I
> know that "freezes" is a bit generic but I can't find a more s
on 30/08/2010 00:13 do...@freebsd.org said the following:
> On 08/29/2010 09:33 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
>>> Can you run firefox from xterm and check for any errors that might be
>>> > generated?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Glen Barber
>>> >
>> Tried doing this. But no output.
>
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 30/08/2010 00:13 do...@freebsd.org said the following:
>> On 08/29/2010 09:33 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
Can you run firefox from xterm and check for any errors that might be
> generated?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:16:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, August 27, 2010 4:11:41 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> > Hi,
> > from "FreeBSD Developers' Handbook, 10.7 Debugging Loadable Modules Using
> > GDB":
> > "...
> > (kgdb) add-symbol-file /sys/modules/linux/linux.ko 0xc0ae22d0
>
removing ~/.mozilla works fine. I think that problem's related to
add-on Xmarks I've been installer or to "Restore session"
functionality
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe
on 30/08/2010 19:12 Alexander Fiveg said the following:
> Yes, the .ko files are loaded automatically. The problem is that they do
> not contain debugging info. I have always to load the .kld file in order to
> debug a module:
хытшзъ
> Is there any way to get the all symbols and needed debug info
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Davide Italiano
wrote:
> removing ~/.mozilla works fine. I think that problem's related to
> add-on Xmarks I've been installer or to "Restore session"
> functionality
It would have been interesting to capture what `froze' the machine, in
particular because it coul
On Monday, August 30, 2010 12:12:50 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:16:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, August 27, 2010 4:11:41 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > from "FreeBSD Developers' Handbook, 10.7 Debugging Loadable Modules Using
> > > GDB":
> > >
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:10:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, August 30, 2010 12:12:50 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:16:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 27, 2010 4:11:41 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > from "FreeBSD Deve
On Friday 25 June 2010 22:12:42 David Naylor wrote:
> On Friday 25 June 2010 20:01:42 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, David Naylor
>
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've created a patch that increases the performance of mtree. This is
> > > of particular use during a p
On Monday, August 30, 2010 4:34:04 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:10:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010 12:12:50 pm Alexander Fiveg wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:16:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Friday, August 27, 2010 4:1
27 matches
Mail list logo
