Re: real memory falsely reports 8G, BIOS & avail memory reports 1G

2010-08-17 Thread Julian H. Stacey
John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, August 09, 2010 8:13:03 am Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi hack...@freebsd.org > > A laptop here emits a puzzlingly dmesg to both 8.1-RC2 & 8.1-RELEASE: > > real memory = 8572108800 (8175 MB) > > avail memory = 1018789888 (971 MB) > > BIOS reckons it has 1G.

Re: Why doesn't ppc(4) check non-ENXIO failures during probe?

2010-08-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, August 16, 2010 7:23:54 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Sunday, August 15, 2010 1:33:38 am Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> One thing that's puzzling me about the ppc(4) driver's ISA > >> routines is that it only checks to see whether

Re: real memory falsely reports 8G, BIOS & avail memory reports 1G

2010-08-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, August 17, 2010 7:49:22 am Julian H. Stacey wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday, August 09, 2010 8:13:03 am Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Hi hack...@freebsd.org > > > A laptop here emits a puzzlingly dmesg to both 8.1-RC2 & 8.1-RELEASE: > > > real memory = 8572108800 (8175 MB)

i386_set_ioperm equiv for x86_64

2010-08-17 Thread Anish Patel
Hi all, sorry if i sent this to the wrong list, but i am trying to find the equivalent call for i386_set_ioperm() for a x86_64 system. Thanks Anish ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hack

Re: i386_set_ioperm equiv for x86_64

2010-08-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:11:42AM -0400, Anish Patel wrote: > Hi all, > sorry if i sent this to the wrong list, but i am trying to find the > equivalent call for i386_set_ioperm() for a x86_64 system. i386_set_ioperm() is the convenience wrapper around sysarch(I386_SET_IOPERM). The same requ

Re: Why doesn't ppc(4) check non-ENXIO failures during probe?

2010-08-17 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, August 16, 2010 7:23:54 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > On Sunday, August 15, 2010 1:33:38 am Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >>     One thing that's puzzling me about the ppc(4) drive

Re: Why doesn't ppc(4) check non-ENXIO failures during probe?

2010-08-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, August 17, 2010 3:56:20 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:07 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday, August 16, 2010 7:23:54 pm Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > On Sunday, August 15, 2010 1:33:38 am Garrett Cooper