Ivan Voras writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Not sure what you mean. The original issue was that someone had used
> > TUNABLE_INT() for something that was actually a memory address. I
> > changed it to TUNABLE_ULONG(). Of course, if your tunable is a boolean
> > value or something like
Garrett Cooper writes:
> Why would someone express a tunable in a memory address (not being
> sarcastic... I just don't see why it makes sense right now, but if
> there's a valid reason I'm more than happy to be educated :)..)?
A few examples:
hw.acpi.host_mem_start
hw.pci.host_mem_start
hw.phys
Marius Nünnerich writes:
> I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
> that has no metadata stored on disk . It is then activated and
> controlled by loader.conf variables. (Maybe like gnop? If I remember
> correctly, I did not take a look at that class for ages).
As you
On 9 August 2010 10:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Marius Nünnerich writes:
>> I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
>> that has no metadata stored on disk . It is then activated and
>> controlled by loader.conf variables. (Maybe like gnop? If I remember
>> correctl
Hi hack...@freebsd.org
A laptop here emits a puzzlingly dmesg to both 8.1-RC2 & 8.1-RELEASE:
real memory = 8572108800 (8175 MB)
avail memory = 1018789888 (971 MB)
BIOS reckons it has 1G. No panel to unscrew to inspect memory.
I don't beleive 8G.
If this is a bug in FreeBSD detect
Ivan Voras writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > Marius Nünnerich writes:
> > > I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
> > > that has no metadata stored on disk . It is then activated and
> > > controlled by loader.conf variables. (Maybe like gnop? If I
> > > reme
> A laptop here emits a puzzlingly dmesg to both 8.1-RC2 & 8.1-RELEASE:
> real memory = 8572108800 (8175 MB)
> avail memory = 1018789888 (971 MB)
> BIOS reckons it has 1G. No panel to unscrew to inspect memory.
> I don't beleive 8G.
PS
sysctl -a | grep mem
vm.kmem_size_scale: 3
v
On 9 August 2010 14:37, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Ivan Voras writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
>> > Marius Nünnerich writes:
>> > > I did not think of a new GEOM class that looks like glabel but one
>> > > that has no metadata stored on disk . It is then activated and
>> > > controlled
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Sergio Ligregni wrote:
> /*
>* We have these posibilities, only the first one is allowed
>* 20100619223115.20100619223131 20100619223131.not_terminated
>* current
>*/
> if (strlen(path) == 29 && path[14] == '.' && isdigit(path[15])) {
> /* XXX To improv
On 08/09/2010 13:24, Janne Snabb wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Sergio Ligregni wrote:
>
>> /*
>>* We have these posibilities, only the first one is allowed
>>* 20100619223115.20100619223131 20100619223131.not_terminated
>>* current
>>*/
>> if (strlen(path) == 29 && path[14] ==
hi there,
just wanted to get some feedback for this tiny patch and if people think it
makes sense.
cheers.
alex
--
a13x
Index: sys/sys/signal.h
===
--- sys/sys/signal.h (revision 24)
+++ sys/sys/signal.h (working copy)
@@ -47,6
11 matches
Mail list logo
